Yes, this proves you're right ... the system prints more money than the FED ... LOL.
This thread is hysterical!
JACK HERSHEY METHOD EXPOSED AS FRAUD! *Debated*
- Thread starter bwolinsky
- Start date
- Status
Yes, this proves you're right ... the system prints more money than the FED ... LOL.
This thread is hysterical!
I think your data or your script is messed up in a way that gives you favorable results. Here a few examples. I'll check it against IB data too, later.
9/18 You buy SSO at 2:00 for 50.36. That's within range, but it is sold on 9/19 at 11:15 for 56.80. 56.80 is the OPEN of the bar at 11:00! Not 11:15.
10/10 You buy SSO at 10:30 for 30.14. 30.14 is the HIGH of the previous bar! You sell on 10:13 at 2:15 for 32.73 is the OPEN of the PREVIOUS bar, at 2:00.
I could keep checking, but what's the point. Anybody that wants to could find many many flaws in your script and data. I think your millions went up in smoke...
9/18 You buy SSO at 2:00 for 50.36. That's within range, but it is sold on 9/19 at 11:15 for 56.80. 56.80 is the OPEN of the bar at 11:00! Not 11:15.
10/10 You buy SSO at 10:30 for 30.14. 30.14 is the HIGH of the previous bar! You sell on 10:13 at 2:15 for 32.73 is the OPEN of the PREVIOUS bar, at 2:00.
I could keep checking, but what's the point. Anybody that wants to could find many many flaws in your script and data. I think your millions went up in smoke...
I said there was a likihood of data corruption way back here: bwolinsky just fucked up again
Thanks for the due diligence Wayne.
What bwolinsky doesn't realize is that in a professional environment, finding just two or three examples of data corrupption like you did means he would have to throw the whole thing out and start over again (because you don't know where there is more bad data, but can assume that it is riddled throughout the backtest).
If he still insisted that he were correct (like he is doing here) he would just be replaced with a competent programer. :eek:
somewhat useful thread
Let me go through this with you, Wayne since it's obvious you don't have a very good command of Wealth Script
I think your data or your script is messed up in a way that gives you favorable results. Here a few examples. I'll check it against IB data too, later.
9/18 You buy SSO at 2:00 for 50.36. That's within range, but it is sold on 9/19 at 11:15 for 56.80. 56.80 is the OPEN of the bar at 11:00! Not 11:15.
This is how WL does it. The 11 am bar is actually the 10:45 to 11 am time, and the stamp is marked 11 am. Therefore, the open price, after we place our market order, is going to be for the 11am to 11:15 am time slot. You know, for someone that claims he's been using WL, this is pretty stupid to have to explain.
10/10 You buy SSO at 10:30 for 30.14. 30.14 is the HIGH of the previous bar! You sell on 10:13 at 2:15 for 32.73 is the OPEN of the PREVIOUS bar, at 2:00.
Yeah, and I'm betting the Open was the High, too.
I could keep checking, but what's the point. Anybody that wants to could find many many flaws in your script and data. I think your millions went up in smoke...
<b>Go plug it in, Asshole...</b>
I think your data or your script is messed up in a way that gives you favorable results. Here a few examples. I'll check it against IB data too, later.
9/18 You buy SSO at 2:00 for 50.36. That's within range, but it is sold on 9/19 at 11:15 for 56.80. 56.80 is the OPEN of the bar at 11:00! Not 11:15.
This is how WL does it. The 11 am bar is actually the 10:45 to 11 am time, and the stamp is marked 11 am. Therefore, the open price, after we place our market order, is going to be for the 11am to 11:15 am time slot. You know, for someone that claims he's been using WL, this is pretty stupid to have to explain.
10/10 You buy SSO at 10:30 for 30.14. 30.14 is the HIGH of the previous bar! You sell on 10:13 at 2:15 for 32.73 is the OPEN of the PREVIOUS bar, at 2:00.
Yeah, and I'm betting the Open was the High, too.
I could keep checking, but what's the point. Anybody that wants to could find many many flaws in your script and data. I think your millions went up in smoke...
<b>Go plug it in, Asshole...</b>
Yes you are.
Hey look, we finally agreed on something.
LOL, why is it always the guys who can't prove their statements after begin caught with their pants down with their GIGO programming are ALWAYS the ones who get aggressive?
If your shit were half as tight as you seem to think it is, this would all be mote.
ET, land of the morons.
Quote from MandelbrotSet:
Yes you are.
Hey look, we finally agreed on something.
LOL, why is it always the guys who can't prove their statements after begin caught with their pants down with their GIGO programming are ALWAYS the ones who get aggressive?
If your shit were half as tight as you seem to think it is, this would all be mote.
ET, land of the morons.
You can go fuck yourself. Since you have no WL data, you're going to be shit of luck.
- Status