I agree.
Why would anyone compare me to a mathematician?
I'm a logicoligist.
I use the works of three primary thinkers.
Keynes for paradigm theory. and Gearge Boole for the Algebra that uses the base of logic theory.
Carnap for logic theory.
And Mandelbrot's predicessors for fractal theory.
As is known, I used Dodd, Granville to generate a complete and in kind hypothesis set. While they never said the words per se they did create the idea of how the variables of the market in a complete manner. Orthogonality is the rule in markets. The same is true in electrical fields as Maxwell stated.
I used set theory to involve the 10 cases of price and the 11 cases of volume to define the process of a trend. Exhaustively I proved the 35 End Effects surrounding the process of trends. Thus two sub sets each with unique elements comprise the whole of the dynamic operation of markets in a systemmic context.
Because of one factor, granularity, markets are in a Lego type world of mathematics as explained above. Therefore, it is natural that the operation of markets is an interlocking of fractal on a three to one basis.
I went though a BE DO HAVE process intellectually. I know where my early experiences happened and what my mind got from them. As it turned out I became enabled. I earned a lifetime of freedom so I haven't been selfish.
If I post, it is a response to a question or, in this thread's case, I rise to insults to me by others who have reasons to insult me.
Above you can read a post of what a person thinks of me. He also faults the management. I won't joke with him and fool him
He is doing what him mind allows.
Another person might take out two sheets of paper and sketch the trend elements. Next the person might construct a trend from these building blocks on a third sheet.
At what point does a person regnize that a filter can produce and end point? At what point does a person recognize a filter does or does not allow a measurement to be taken.
Look at a two bar symetric pennent; can you undrstand that the volume of the second bar does not warrant a measurement of the progress of a trend? No you cannot if you think I am an imposter. Your mind has a filter in it; I meet a criteria (one of many posted by the OP as a crackpot a part of being an imposter) so you cannot take out two sheets of paper to put down 21 sketches that form the unique collection of RDBMS elements that comprize trends.
Experience has shown that if you cannot read my posts, simply stated, you are not ready to read my posts.
On the otherhand, I have been told when rereading my posts 6 months later, they communicate an entirely different content.
All I can say is that the mind is a wonderful thing. In the process of learning in a field, as learning happens, a person wakes up one morning.
his mind is coming into conscioous focus from spending the night in unconsciousness. Unconsciousness is a busy busy time. All the unconscious perceptions of the prior day, have been processed by the mind into their places in parallel with the prior placed conscious thoughts.
before this special morning in this person's life, the sleeping tasks were never completed. But this morning they were completed.
Wakefullness causes a unique once in a liftime first occurence. It is not recognized or classified or thought about, even. It just happens and you find out later if ever.
From that point on in learning in a field, the person notices that his mind is asking leading questions. Questions that always help to strengthen the weakest portions of the spectrum so far built in the knowledge field being learned. What a mental shift this is.
So in this present book I am knocking out, I discovered to do chapters in pairs. One to introduce a subject and the next one to explain to the reder how to get the lowdown on the subject, i. e., how to put it in his long term memory spectrum.
I added sematic differentials to each of these "lowdown" chapters. The reader gets to find out where he is in learning and what he has to do drills in to learn it purposefully.
So I have a deal with the OP. He either works or he craps out. I gave him an NLP picture. He took the numbers off the items from the original. Too bad for him.
