See, that's the thing: the odds. One of the things I take issue with is the specificity with which some people assign probabilities to the market. The probabilities in such a dynamic environment are just not sufficiently stable to afford the kind of precision that some people believe exists. My own view is that there is more uncertainty than numeric probability in the market. So while you might be able to estimate the balance of probability with some reasonable level of confidence, I can't help but think that people who forecast share prices to the penny with numeric probability specificity are exhibiting the fact that they don't know what they don't know.What are the odds of you coming back fred? I liked the cartoon.
Well said.See, that's the thing: the odds. One of the things I take issue with is the specificity with which some people assign probabilities to the market. The probabilities in such a dynamic environment are just not sufficiently stable to afford the kind of precision that some people believe exists. My own view is that there is more uncertainty than numeric probability in the market. So while you might be able to estimate the balance of probability with some reasonable level of confidence, I can't help but think that people who forecast share prices to the penny with numeric probability specificity are exhibiting the fact that they don't know what they don't know.
"Balance of probability" is more of a go or no-go kind of thing with better than even odds. People putting a precise number on the odds makes me think that there is a 94.786% chance that these people don't know what they don't know. Just my opinion, of course.
And now, if no one refers to me going forward, I will do my best to stay away from this thread.
Precision does exist much more than what facts suggest..The probabilities in such a dynamic environment are just not sufficiently stable to afford the kind of precision that some people believe exists.
I've seen it done elsewhere, publicly, and days in advance.......reversal price forecast to a quarter point accuracy on a 5 digit index. He even showed me how he did it and I was stunned to see such "coincidences of precision".So while you might be able to estimate the balance of probability with some reasonable level of confidence, I can't help but think that people who forecast share prices to the penny with numeric probability specificity are exhibiting the fact that they don't know what they don't know.
Hindsight and cherry picking are wonderful things.Precision does exist much more than what facts suggest..
I've seen it done elsewhere, publicly, and days in advance.......reversal price forecast to a quarter point accuracy on a 5 digit index. He even showed me how he did it and I was stunned to see such "coincidences of precision".
It doesn't work all the time.
Making posts in a public forum days in ADVANCE isn't cherry picking.Hindsight and cherry picking are wonderful things.
Perhaps you should reread what you wrote and think about it for a moment.Precision does exist much more than what facts suggest..
I once got 4 numbers on a six number lottery ticket. It doesn't happen all the time. Some people get all six numbers. They seldom repeat the feat.I've seen it done elsewhere, publicly, and days in advance.......reversal price forecast to a quarter point accuracy on a 5 digit index. He even showed me how he did it and I was stunned to see such "coincidences of precision".
It doesn't work all the time.
Have you heard of luck, coincidence.Making posts in a public forum days in ADVANCE isn't cherry picking.
Those who are bliind think that it isn't possible for anyone in the world to ever see.