I've Never Liked Hillary...

To be the most "powerful person on the planet", likely involves ego. I don't really care about that and is to be expected... I do care about what the POTUS actually does. (And on that score, Odumbo righteously earns an "F"!)

Back-to-back Obama-Hillary might actually be a good thing for non-Democrats.

After another 4 or 8 years of "this" the pressure could have built to such an unbearable level (amongst some) that a massive swing to full on mega raging Republican could be likely. In the meantime Hills will be a relatively safe pair of hands.

You might consider four years of Trump followed by a strong swing back to Democrats as less desirable.

I realize I could be talking complete nonsense.
 
Back-to-back Obama-Hillary might actually be a good thing for non-Democrats.

After another 4 or 8 years of "this" the pressure could have built to such an unbearable level (amongst some) that a massive swing to full on mega raging Republican could be likely. In the meantime Hills will be a relatively safe pair of hands.

I realize I could be talking complete nonsense.
A return to common sense! For example, Rubio, as below...

"How Rubio Would Deal With China
"In the WSJ, Marco Rubio says Obama hasn't been tough enough with China on economic issues:

"President Obama has continued to appease China’s leaders ...[with] his insufficient responses to economic ... concerns"​

"What would he do?

"For years, China has subsidized exports, devalued its currency, restricted imports and stolen technology on a massive scale. As president, I would respond not through aggressive retaliation, which would hurt the U.S. as much as China, but by greater commitment and firmer insistence on free markets and free trade. This means immediately moving forward with the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other trade agreements."​

"So, unlike Obama, who wants to move forward immediately with the TPP and other trade agreements, he'd move forward immediately with the TPP and other trade agreements."
 
Back-to-back Obama-Hillary might actually be a good thing for non-Democrats.

After another 4 or 8 years of "this" the pressure could have built to such an unbearable level (amongst some) that a massive swing to full on mega raging Republican could be likely. In the meantime Hills will be a relatively safe pair of hands.

You might consider four years of Trump followed by a strong swing back to Democrats as less desirable.

I realize I could be talking complete nonsense.
 
And Trump, high risk surgery without anaesthetic.

Disagree. Any candidate who claims/promises to "put America first" is a breath of fresh air.... assuming he follows through, of course. (Odumbo promised similar... then FUCKED 50% of us every which way from Sunday.... don't need any more liars as POTUS.)

We don't need, "more of the same". We don't need, "DemoCraps lite" from a Republican.
 
After another 4 or 8 years of "this" the pressure could have built to such an unbearable level (amongst some) that a massive swing to full on mega raging Republican could be likely.

the problem with socialism it is like drug, repeated injection makes receiver an addict: he wants more, and even realizing very soon that's this is bad for him in the long run the addict (in this case society) wants more and more now...
 
Back
Top