Quote from tradingjournals:
what if the months do not have equal implied volty? Extreme examples: What if 1 month implied volty = twice the 4 month implied?
That's a great point, and another feature for the software - which I think users have demonstrated has utility, by demanding support for that type of feature.
For example, most data terminals provide an IV for the underlying (without more information, my guess is that's what Van Halen's image was displaying in the two projected, or dotted, lines).
The underlying doesn't have an IV, so to produce one, the IV of its options are substituted.
To your point, accounting for variations in IVs of multiple contracts (calls/puts, strikes and time), combine IVs from various options. For example, weigh IV from the current month, near-the-money calls/puts, or a weighted contribution from subsequent months (eg., 75% current, 25% next month).
In any event, you're left with a distribution of what the market (investors) have priced (ie, are betting) the likely range of the stock will be in the future.
That could be used any number of ways. Our video demonstrated one use: The likelihood of a price change in the underlying being enough to warrant action (ie, hedging or closing a position).
However, it could also be used to open any combinations of new positions, based on one's independent analysis (ie, is the market mispricing the underlying, and if so, what position would best exploit that mispricing?).
At the end of the day, if your analysis indicates a $10 stock will be worth $20 in 3 months, but the prices of options indicate that as an unlikely possibility, then you have actionable information - just hope your analysis is more accurate than the market's
Thank you for the critique. I appreciate the insight, and would appreciate more.
Brent