Quote from Hello:
And the funny thing is these assholes are still brazen enough to do whatever they want, all because of a corrupt system, where they more then likely will just get a paid sick leave for this kind of shit.
I do not believe that the TV station or the cameraman are going to let this be swept under the rug. It made their news broadcast, so that definitely shows their thinking.
The council woman upon seeing the photos of the cop's conduct realized that he had not only put himself in jeopardy but had put the city in jeopardy as well. here is what i mean;
1....it is obvious that the cop overstepped his authority (councilwoman agrees through actions)
2....the cop through his conduct assaulted a peaceful citizen
3....the cop was carrying a weapon at the time
4....the cop was acting as an agent of the government at the time (never off duty)
5....the above would constitute felony assault on part of the cop
6....there were other cops there that failed to protect the cameraman's rights, thus they have ethics violations
7....if the government has similar abuse cases by any governmenmt employee, that establishes pattern behavior
8....the prosecutor would be required to file charges against the cop for felony assault
9....the prosecutor would be required on conviction to notify P.O.S.T.
with the above an enterprising lawyer could represent the cameraman and possibly file a civil case against the government, the cop and possibly the other cops for charges of civil rights violation, assault with a weapon, conspiracy, and RICO....what are the odds of this happening? with lawyers hurt just as bad as other professions. I think pretty good chance of it.
I would like to have heard the conversation between the councilwoman and the cop, it would have been very interesting.
just because the cop gave the cameraman a summons is just the cop's attempt to CYA and an honest judge and jury would see through that