It's still mathematically possible Trump wins the election even without fraud

There's going to be illegal votes by both sides. There would have to be mass fraud by one side for it to make up 5 figures.

Right. So if we both agree there are going to be illegal votes, why would we not want to do a full recount to determine the validity of an election that is so ridiculously close in certain key states?
 
He discusses what his application was designed for and actually did about half way through the video.

Ray Tomlinson is credited for developing the ARPANET (aka Internet) based email system. Ayyadurai created interoffice computer based mail.

Honestly, that's pretty good for a 14 year old kid when the other guy was likely funded by the department of defense.
 
Last edited:
Right. So if we both agree there are going to be illegal votes, why would we not want to do a full recount to determine the validity of an election that is so ridiculously close in certain key states?
Trump is entitled to recounts in WI and GA. Not sure about AZ. PA looks to be outside the margin of .5%. If Biden wins the recounts in WI and GA neither AZ or PA will matter anyways.
 
Trump is entitled to recounts in WI and GA. Not sure about AZ. PA looks to be outside the margin of .5%. If Biden wins the recounts in WI and GA neither AZ or PA will matter anyways.

If recounts in states where Biden wins makes it not matter elsewhere, we should still do the recounts to determine if there are issues in the specific states. After all, what is important is certifying an election so the country can truly move forward, secure that the electoral process is sound.
 
You didn't answer my question though, did he really invent email as mentioned in his twitter handle.

Is he credible enough for you now... did we vet him out enough? Lets see your math now.

I'm surprised you're questioning anyone's intellect, you voted for someone with a quarter of a brain cell.
 
If recounts in states where Biden wins makes it not matter elsewhere, we should still do the recounts to determine if there are issues in the specific states. After all, what is important is certifying an election so the country can truly move forward, secure that the electoral process is sound.
The problem is he is bringing forth illegitimate claims. If he had legitimate evidence then I agree, but enabling him, because he's throwing a tantrum sets a bad precedent for future elections. Do you really think if they recount he'll give up? He's never going to admit defeat, because it's not who he is.
 
Is he credible enough for you now... did we vet him out enough? Lets see your math now.

Why would I bother with every bit of vomit coming out from twitter randos? If you have the math, get the election overturned, let me just enjoy the shitshow.

By the way, Giuliani to hold counter-press conference at the Embassy Suites Plumbing Supply.
 
Why would I bother with every bit of vomit coming out from twitter randos? If you have the math, get the election overturned, let me just enjoy the shitshow.

By the way, Giuliani to hold counter-press conference at the Embassy Suites Plumbing Supply.

That's not how you prove/disprove something moron. Where's your math.
 
Back
Top