It's snowing.
- Thread starter jnbadger
- Start date
It has nothing to do with my politics. I was taught the scientific method and, unlike you, apply that knowledge to scientific analysis.
The amount of global warming the alarmists present is in question and the cause is certainly in question. Data mostly points to other sources for any warming during the last 200 years.
I am not rigidly ignorant of the science like you are. By only presenting data that support the desired conclusion those loosely called scientists are not acting in the interests of science.
AGW is an agenda and the two types of people who support it are those trying to support that agenda and those too ignorant to realize what the former are doing.
You are wrong. Virtually the entire world's knowledge and expertise regarding climate science, not to mention common sense, contradicts your amateur opinion.
Yes, virtually all the world's climate scientists and all it's science organizations are wrong and an ideologically deranged guy on some message board is right. LOL.
You don't even know what climate scientists are saying. You only listen to a select few who are on an agenda. You can't admit to any updated science and new understanding. You're just stuck in a rut and don't change with the facts. You're just a moron on a message board with a broken message.
New paper predicts a sharp decline in solar activity until 2100
A new paper published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Research shows solar activity peaked at the end of the 20th century, but predicts a strong decrease in solar activity until around 2100 AD to low levels similar to the Dalton Minimum.
<img src=http://kaltesonne.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/mar6.gif width=400 height=251>
Figure 4 from Steinhilber and Beer shows solar activity peaked at the end of the 20th century, but is predicted to decline to levels similar to the Dalton Minimum during the 21st century. The two different shades of gray correspond to two different models. The Dalton Minimum "D" and Maunder Minimum "M" are notated.
Prediction of solar activity for the next 500 years
Friedhelm Steinhilber, Jürg Beer
Abstract: Recently a new low-noise record of solar activity has been reconstructed for the past 9.400 years by combining two 10 Be records from Greenland and Antarctica with 14 C from tree rings [F. Steinhilber et al., 2012]. This record confirms earlier results, namely that the Sun has varied with distinct periodicities in the past. We present a prediction of mean solar magnetic activity averaged over 22 years for the next 500 years mainly based on the spectral information derived from the record of the past solar activity. Assuming that the Sun will continue varying with the same periodicities for the next centuries we extract the spectral information from the past and apply it in two different methods to predict the future of solar magnetic activity. First, the two methods are tested by predicting past changes. Our methods are able to predict periods of high and low solar activity for a few centuries in the past. However, they are less successful in predicting the correct amplitude. Then, the methods were used to predict the period 2000-2500. Both methods predict a period of low activity around 2100 AD. Between 2100 AD and 2350 AD the results are inconsistent regarding the duration of the low activity state in 2100 AD and the level of activity until 2250 AD. Around 2250 AD both methods predict a period of moderate activity. After 2350 AD both methods point to a period of high activity. The period of high activity will end around 2400 AD and will be followed by a period of moderate activity.
http://www.intellicast.com/Local/Forecast.aspx
Finally, a nice weekend. First of the year.
Fucurecurrents finally came through for me.
Finally, a nice weekend. First of the year.
Fucurecurrents finally came through for me.
Rather than arguing with lunatics, why don't we take up a collection to have futurecrap, and/or lyingricter's brains scanned? We could pay them to have the scan, they'll know where they "stand" brain-health wise, etc., Only caveat: the results have to be disclosed after being compared to the brain of a no bullshit type of the same age and ethnicity group.