It's not a crime when the President does it

Rudy says Trump could shoot Comey and still not be indicted for it.


Giuliani: Trump Could Have Shot Comey And Still Couldn’t Be Indicted For It
Congress would have to impeach Trump first before any criminal prosecution could move forward, the president’s lawyer says.


WASHINGTON ― Candidate Donald Trump bragged that he could shoot someone on New York’s Fifth Avenue and not lose any support, and now President Donald Trump’s lawyer says Trump could shoot the FBI director in the Oval Office and still not be prosecuted for it.

“In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted,” Rudy Giuliani told HuffPost Sunday, claiming a president’s constitutional powers are that broad. “I don’t know how you can indict while he’s in office. No matter what it is.”

Giuliani said impeachment was the initial remedy for a president’s illegal behavior ― even in the extreme hypothetical case of Trump having shot former FBI Director James Comey to end the Russia investigation rather than just firing him.

“If he shot James Comey, he’d be impeached the next day,” Giuliani said. “Impeach him, and then you can do whatever you want to do to him.”

Norm Eisen, the White House ethics lawyer under President Barack Obama and now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the silliness of Giuliani’s claim illustrates how mistaken Trump’s lawyers are about presidential power.

“A president could not be prosecuted for murder? Really?” he said. “It is one of many absurd positions that follow from their argument. It is self-evidently wrong.
 
You would know

No you're the one who posted the stats. This implies that you know. On the other hand, it's possible you have no idea where those stats came from, or what they mean (include).

Which is it? Do you know or was that satire?
 
No you're the one who posted the stats. This implies that you know. On the other hand, it's possible you have no idea where those stats came from, or what they mean (include).

Which is it? Do you know or was that satire?


https://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/


Domain

Times mentioned in the last 48 hours


on.rt

66

zerohedge.com

57

sptnkne.ws

56

rt.com

45

breitbart.com

40

45.wh

37

thegatewaypundit.com

32

telegraaf.nl

31

hannity.com

28

aml.ink
 

The link you posted implies that it is watching Russian social media traffic in the protection of democracy.

But it doesn't answer my question. According to you, Mooooooler has purportedly gotten 75 indictments. The question was:

Are the Russian social media pushers among the 75 criminal charges?

And if so, what law, in Mooolers opinion, makes the Russians social media pushers criminals?
 
The link you posted implies that it is watching Russian social media traffic in the protection of democracy.

But it doesn't answer my question. According to you, Mooooooler has purportedly gotten 75 indictments. The question was:



And if so, what law, in Mooolers opinion, makes the Russians social media pushers criminals?
Good question. And while you're answering questions Exgopr... at which ballot-boxes exactly did the Russians have goons posted to force people to vote for Trump? Certainly all those Obama voters that crossed the aisle must have done so out of fear of retribution. One has to assume they are way too smart to be swayed by a few $500 Facebook ads.
 
Back
Top