no substance there.
basically a a harvard law prof he gave up his impartiality and gravitas a long time ago... speculating that a person could be compelled to testify.
Which is true.. but either tribe or the author left an important point out.
a court could only compel testimony if the court could say for sure the person had no legal jeopardy for their testimony. a court can't compel someone to testify against their per the 5th amendment..
"nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself"
a pardon in one area... would not remove a person's 5th amendment right in other areas.
basically a a harvard law prof he gave up his impartiality and gravitas a long time ago... speculating that a person could be compelled to testify.
Which is true.. but either tribe or the author left an important point out.
a court could only compel testimony if the court could say for sure the person had no legal jeopardy for their testimony. a court can't compel someone to testify against their per the 5th amendment..
"nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself"
a pardon in one area... would not remove a person's 5th amendment right in other areas.
How a Presidential Pardon Could Backfire
http://time.com/4868418/donald-trump-presidential-pardons-backfire/
Last edited: