its all about pure math

[miss asian]

Ok.. guys
[8:29:44 AM] ForexQuantMe: Above EPT bullish
[8:29:49 AM] ForexQuantMe: below EPT bearish
[8:30:02 AM] ForexQuantMe: above you buy targeting Upper limit
[8:30:10 AM] ForexQuantMe: Below You sell targeting lower limit
[8:30:34 AM] ForexQuantMe: when price reaches uppper limit, market turns ( sell)
[8:30:47 AM] ForexQuantMe: when price reaches Lower limit You ( Buy)
[8:30:58 AM] ForexQuantMe: these are general rules to use
[8:31:21 AM] ForexQuantMe: in between we get some setups for intraday .. but can only been seen when it happens live

 

[intradaybill]

Quote from kinggyppo:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=229386

this thread really can't be taken seriously, can it. My point was we are approaching the speed of light in terms of latency, how much would it cost to colocate with a proven scalable strategy or what are all these programmers really working on better moving average crossovers?

Sorry but you can't be taken seriously if you think HFT utilizes MA crossovers.

 

[ammo]

well we just hit the 1 3656 low to the tick

 

[kinggyppo]

Quote from intradaybill:

Sorry but you can't be taken seriously if you think HFT utilizes MA crossovers.

you missed my sarcasm.

 

[DontMissTheBus]

I disagree with you there friend. Without context, it's just an algebraic expression. In the context of physics, it's Maxwell's equation. In the context of dispersion trading (for example), it's a correlation adjustment factor;

That's what I mean by without context.

Had you quoted a latin phrase such as... say, Cogito ergo sum, it's still meaningless without context even though the phrase itself may be well known.

Quote from kut2k2:

It has context, and is recognized worldwide as Maxwell's calculation for the speed of light. If I had quoted, say, a Latin phrase, would you still talk about "scribbling without context"?

Here's some more "scribbling": Neko ni koban

 

[Equalizer]

Quote from atticus:

This thread is useless without titty pics.

In keeping with the "pure math" title, how about a pure mathematician (group theorist) named Tits. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Tits

 

[atticus]

Quote from Equalizer:

In keeping with the "pure math" title, how about a pure mathematician (group theorist) named Tits. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Tits

lol yes, heard of him. The Tits Group. What an awesome titty bar in Montreal!

 

[Bob111]

Quote from miss asian:

welcome traders to my thread.

i just want to change ideas about my method in trades and your trade. lets talk about math only.
i will post my daily chart here.

after 6 pages i still see no math here..sorry about MY english..maybe i'm missing something...no method explanation either.what are we talking about here? i have no idea..
if one want to talk about method or ideas then what i would expect is description of it..to start-how the price levels are calculated?

 

[kinggyppo]

Quote from Bob111:

after 6 pages i still see no math here..sorry about MY english..maybe i'm missing something...no method explanation either.what are we talking about here? i have no idea..
if one want to talk about method or ideas then what i would expect is description of it..to start-how the price levels are calculated?

bob this person just started trading look at my link

 

[intradaybill]

Quote from Bob111:

after 6 pages i still see no math here..sorry about MY english..maybe i'm missing something...no method explanation either.what are we talking about here? i have no idea..
if one want to talk about method or ideas then what i would expect is description of it..to start-how the price levels are calculated?

Why don't you start with some math? I already asked a question:

"My first question is whether it is posisble to have a non-certain risk of ruin with win probability of 50%."