Quote from charts:
It seems that your chart is about four bars short ... 
Including them, the first question: is the sequence complete? (if yes: why? if no: why? what are you looking for to consider it as complete?)
Then (only when the answer to the above is yes): is there a change signal? (which one(s)? what do you consider change signals?)
And all these staying on your trading fractal. You definitely have to use volume too.
Indeed I clipped it BUT although I see what you might be saying, at this point in time (with the 4 bars included), I will hold with my earlier statement that it is incomplete. I always use volume, always, and as for knowing them there change signals, as best I can tell, I know what they are and have stated so elsewhere in the journal. Romanus and I tried to get people to put down what they thought the SOC's were but except for 1 or 2 others nothing was said (Spyder aside). What are your signals charts? We all know, as you have stated, that traverse change signals are meaningless unless there has been completion.
I've said before that I use WGTrader's method, slightly modified, and so if I am wrong, I really don't care for two reasons. Firstly, I would have gone long on the 4:05 bar if it wasn't after RTH (that's just me). Secondly if I am wrong then one of the signals that I use for indicating lack of completion is wrong, in this context, and I've learned something new. So whatever happens is a positive outcome.
What I see so often on this thread is people flogging themselves over things they can't see and figure they should be able to see at the time they couldn't and it's really demoralizing to themselves and others. So fack dat. Been there. Done that. There are other ways to get this stuff and one of them is what I described above. Pardon the nano-rant.
For fun, how do you decide where to start the 'volume' line when you are looking at Vacc?
lj