Iterative Refinement

Quote from frenchfry:
Yes, I know that's why I give him the benefit of doubt. I assume he wants to tell me something but just doesn't know how. :)
You are right, it is really unbelievable if you look at all he did during all those years. Trying to teach people how it is done, replying to the same question probably for the 50th time and still people don't get it. I can understand that he gets/could get tired of it at the end.
More...

and yet... there are always people who wants to go off the reserve, quoting 3rd party posts, then coming back to demand a clarification. WTF ?!?!
 
afternoon, had serious drawig tool malfunctions, had to shut down early.

Tape drawing questions:
up tape, close outside rtl but higher high and low, FAN?

internals inside a tape, start new tape?

tape drawing still seems more of an art than a binary procedure, should it be totally binary?
 

Attachments

Quote from R/R:

I am concerned, (and I am not alone with this), that the Pt2 of the previous down channel, which I annotated at 12/4 13:35, had not cleared it's previous up channel RTL.
More...
Great job, R/R - you beat me to the punch. I had similar thoughts to yours in regards to Spyder's riddle, and I was also concerned about the location of the down channel's P2. I've been trying to find a context such that the P2 at 1335 on 12/4/08 was not the "real" P2, and that the "real" down channel P2 occurred at 1535 on 12/4/08 when the forming down channel accelerated out of the previous up channel (pink in the attached). If you look at my medium level Gaussans you can see proper volume cycling for a full ES-only non-dominant up traverse from 1545 on 12/4 to 945 on 12/5. Then we get the maroon down traverse to complete the accelerated pink down channel. However, I cannot find a way to annotate an ES-only dominant traverse from 1440-1540, which means the first leg of the accelerated channel is incomplete. So I too remain confused as to how to reconcile the fact that P2 of the down channel appears to be inside of the previous up channel.

Edit: I just realized I accidentally deleted the decreasing red medium-level Gaussian from 1440 EST to 1455 EST (1340-1355 CST on the attached chart).
 

Attachments

Chart for today. I'm not up to par with the current annotation convention (it makes me confused). If my charts annotated using the 'old style' is confusing for you, please let me know and I'll stop posting them. Not that they wouldn't be confusing whatever the annotation style used :D .
 

Attachments

Quote from guavaman:

I am anxious to see how others annotated the OB at15:40 :D
More...
I have the same
vg38gp.jpg
 
I still need to debrief. I'm not excited about my annotations for the first part of the day, with the accelerated CO traverse followed quickly by a fan. I probably missed something but the green, the gray and the maroon all look like valid ES-only traverses to me.
 

Attachments

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top