Iterative Refinement

Quote from romanus:

... if one thought that 11:30 to 12:10 was a 5 min ES level traverse - where would one put B2B (specifically the rising 2nd B of B2B) under that assumption? ...
1125 1130 !!
 
Quote from charts:

...
I see.:)

If I am not mistaken, you have decreasing red gaussian drawn from 10:40 bar to 11:25 bar. Which is how one annotates a non-dominant portion of up traverse.

In which case it also means that you propose the 10:40 bar to be a point 2 in the up traverse.

So, where's the point 1 of the up traverse then?

:D
 
Quote from romanus:

I see.:)

If I am not mistaken, you have decreasing red gaussian drawn from 10:40 bar to 11:25 bar. Which is how one annotates a non-dominant portion of up traverse.

In which case it also means that you propose the 10:40 bar to be a point 2 in the up traverse.

So, where's the point 1 of the up traverse then?

:D
... pt1 is where it is on the chart ... it's just that I draw gaussians a little differently: the second level gaussians show the actual volume trend ... so your interpretation can't be applied here :)
 
Quote from romanus:

The market 'fanned' out on the way down, so it had to do the same on the way up.

Also, if one thought that 11:30 to 12:10 was a 5 min ES level traverse - where would one put B2B (specifically the rising 2nd B of B2B) under that assumption? Which is another way of saying what ehorn already said to you.

In other words, it seems that correctly annotated chart does hold all the answers. I consider it somewhat freaky:D

Even 2 events that explain what happened here :)
It seems that learning new things about this method doesn't ever stop.
Thanks romanus.

--
innersky
 
Quote from charts:

... pt1 is where it is on the chart
If that's the case then the red decreasing gaussian cannot end at point 1, otherwise we end up with point 1 being at the trough of R\/B - which is an impossibility.


Quote from charts:

it's just that I draw gaussians a little differently
Agreed.

Quote from charts:

... the second level gaussians show the actual volume trend ... so your interpretation can't be applied here :)
If your first level gaussians are the ones located below the second level gaussians, then I still can't see the B2B trough - you have increasing red gaussian coming from 11:15 bar and ending at 11:20 bar ....
... which then becomes increasing black gaussian. You do, in fact, draw gaussians a little differently.:D And since I am not familiar with this particular way of drawing the gaussians - you are absolutely correct - my interpretation can't be applied there.
 
Quote from romanus:

If that's the case then the red decreasing gaussian cannot end at point 1, otherwise we end up with point 1 being at the trough of R\/B - which is an impossibility. ...
... this situation is an example where the market action is almost right in between resolutions, so if you watch the 5 min chart you see the pt1 in one position, but if you watch the 15 min chart you see it in a different position (longer than half an hour earlier, in this situation the absolute FTT) ... interestingly, in both situations you end up reversing at about same price level :) ... try it!
... also, look at the nice sequence carry-over
 

Attachments

Back
Top