Quote from romanus:
Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind, if you have a chance - could you post the quick and dirty rendering of today's trendlines. With all the fractal jumping today I have totally lost my bearings.
You mean like this....?
Quote from romanus:
Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind, if you have a chance - could you post the quick and dirty rendering of today's trendlines. With all the fractal jumping today I have totally lost my bearings.
Have you come up with an answer to this question?Quote from romanus:
Spydertrader, if you'd be so kind, if you have a chance - could you post the quick and dirty rendering of today's trendlines. With all the fractal jumping today I have totally lost my bearings.
Quote from Spydertrader:
It shouldn't have appeared that the market had completed its sequences. In other words, the market had clearly indicated that it had not done so - prior to the arrival of 4:00 PM. The market itself had indicated that it had only travelled between Points One and Two by time the 15:50 bar closed. From here forward, the market again indicated its intentions - movement from Point Two to Point Three. One need look no further than the lessons discussed in January 2007 in order to understand how the market spoke and why.
- Spydertrader
Quote from guavaman:
With sincere respect to Romanus,
Quote from dkm:
Would it not be more accurate to say
Guava, I'm with you on that one. Spyders comment sent me for a spin. I viewed as DKM suggested. I had a reply written up along with an annotated snippet of how I viewed it but realized how one, worded, or how many pt2's one saw in that area had no effect in this SPECIFIC example on the PnL. I had sequence repeat and the way I trade that is all I needed. I'm still trying to understand the dom-nondom and return to dominance before seeking change stuff. I'm pretty sure I jump fractals constantly so it makes it hard for my lonely brain cell to grasp everything.
have a great weekend everyone.