Iterative Refinement
- Thread starter Spydertrader
- Start date
... V leads P ... in other words: looking at V you should be able to anticipate P ... objectively drawn gaussians should help drawing correct traverses, channels, ... into the future ...
EDIT: on Neoxx' thread Jack mentioned trading based only on V ... and no, I don't mean vampire blood ...
Quote from charts:
... V leads P ... in other words: looking at V you should be able to anticipate P ... objectively drawn gaussians should help drawing correct traverses, channels, ... into the future ...
EDIT: on Neoxx' thread Jack mentioned trading based only on V ... and no, I don't mean vampire blood ...
Ease up dude. I was just messing around.
I get it.
Been sequencing volume for a while now.
Just had to give you a hard time about that holiday season chart with no price bars. You are one stubborn individual.
I really hate the thread litter and now have become part of it.
I'm done.
Quote from charts:
... so are you objectively "sequencing" it? ... does it help you ... a lot?
I pretty much just follow what has been presented in the thread now.
I sequenced volume only, for a while, and learned a great deal.
One can do that but it is like playing around of golf with 1 club when the rules allow 14. Why would one choose to do that?
It was very educational and when combined properly with what Spyder has presented recently, things have more clarity.
We should be sequencing both price and volume.
Latley the key for me has been how I draw tapes, and monitor the trend of volume in that tape. Is it increasing, decreasing or staying in the same pace level. This has created less number of confusing bars during the day.
Spydertrader, you've stressed this for several months now, and to individuals with (I think) quite different skill levels and attitudes.
Are you referring to one specific component, or does it vary with each individual / occasion?
If it is one component, do you mean the detailed understanding of sequencing on multiple fractals?
TIA.
-palinuro
Correct.
Each individual has missed a different 'note' on the sheet music, but the notes all reside around the same scale.
For some, this represents the area which requires additional focus. For others, thorough, complete and accurate annotation remains the major obstacle. In addition, a failure to shift one's mindset from, "Does the Market always create a Point Three?" to "The Market does always create a Point Three!" has prevented the trader from further progression.
Of course, a number of people have simply failed to follow directions. Either believing they have done so without 'seeing' they haven't or believing contrasting, conflicting or changed information has been presented when the reality is, nothing has changed. Proof of this resides on the charts of some of the newer folks (whether or not these new 'beginners' realize they already know the correct answers remains another matter entirely) where the recent beginners follow directions correctly, but some of the folks who have been here since the begining to not.
Strangely enough, sometimes a simple review of the presented material creates an environment whereby a trader 'sees' things differently the second time through. I'm told, "Oh! That's what he meant by that post!" is a phrase many people have reported saying during their own return to the M phase.
HTH.
- Spydertrader
No.
- Spydertrader