Iterative Refinement

[Spydertrader]

Quote from guavaman:

This would make the 11:55 to 12:20 a LM and not tapes

The above assertion has zero impact on the question at hand.

- Spydertrader

 

[guavaman]

Quote from Spydertrader:

The above assertion has zero impact on the question at hand.

what a buzz kill

 

[romanus]

Quote from Spydertrader:

The above assertion has zero impact on the question at hand.

- Spydertrader

That's true - but as a separate question it represents an interesting dilemma:
Since 1150 is PA - 1220 and 1225 are both dominant in which case 1230 was supposed to be signal for change. Except it wasn't.

Therefore, the only possibility which can explain why 1230 wasn't a change would be a lateral beginning 1155, which would make both 1220 and 1225 non-dominant.

However 1150 is clearly a PA.

Totally lost bearings here.... unless the fact that it's a non-dominant PA has anything to do with it.

 

[romanus]

Another interesting question - did 1410 become dominant because of pa on 1400 or due to RTL break.

 

[PTVtrader]

...

 

[innersky]

Starting from 15:00 to 15:50, is that a HVS?

--
thanks,

innersky

 

[Spydertrader]

.

 

[romanus]

Quote from Spydertrader:

. es.jpg

Spydertrader, do you consider 12:25 to be a Pace Acceleration based on acceleration of Gaussian slope? Or, is it just a Pace Increase?

Thank you.

EDIT: In other words, would an acceleration of Gaussian slope be sufficient to conclude PA or the Pace has to be on a different level, compared to previous bar, based on pace lines. And therefore not every acceleration of Gaussian slope represents PA.

 

[Spydertrader]

Quote from innersky:

Starting from 15:00 to 15:50, is that a HVS?

No.

Quote from romanus:

Do you consider 12:25 to be a Pace Acceleration based on acceleration of Gaussian slope? Or, is it just a Pace Increase?

Neither.

Quote from romanus:

EDIT: In other words, would an acceleration of Gaussian slope be sufficient to conclude PA or the Pace has to be on a different level, compared to previous bar, based on pace lines. And therefore not every acceleration of Gaussian slope represents PA.

I do not believe you have thoroughly thought through the implications of your question. As a result, no matter how I choose to answer, I feel you'll end up applying the answer to a question you did not ask.

Think through each possible scenario which meets the criteria set forth by your question. See if you don't find one response can, in no way, satisfy the question asked. Unless, of course, the response is, "maybe."

- Spydertrader

 

[romanus]

Quote from Spydertrader:

I do not believe you have thoroughly thought through the implications of your question.

I am a little bit slow today. The cold is clogging up the brain and reducing the speed of neurons

Quote from Spydertrader:

As a result, no matter how I choose to answer, I feel you'll end up applying the answer to a question you did not ask.

Think through each possible scenario which meets the criteria set forth by your question. See if you don't find one response can, in no way, satisfy the question asked. Unless, of course, the response is, "maybe."

I'll think about it more and see if I can resolve this when my brain is working again.

Thank you.