Iterative Refinement
- Thread starter Spydertrader
- Start date
Yeah well, whatever gives you the screentime.
Also I like to add:
>There are those however, who want to see even more
Simply accepting you cannot know everything (vs. trying to explain) and that some trades are small losers (+ completely accepting this) is an important part of the key.
regards,
Ivo
))Since your post about how "[you] prefer not to be mentioned as someone who made or is making money using this method", glad to see you've finally "figured it out yourself."
Congrats on your accomplishments.
I'm sure your collegues who spent considerable time answering your questions via skype are happy for you as well.
- Spydertrader
Funny how I was chastised about this whole peak versus acceleration thing. More or less told I was out of line and that a simiple straightforward definition was in fact already given.
CLEARLY IT WASN'T.
I requested a definition that completely defines what peak volume is. I was told it was given.
IT WASN'T.
Spydertrader, long ago, stated in this journal he hid nothing about how he traded. Apparently that is no longer the case, and hasn't been for a long, long while. That's his choice. But to play games and insinuate that what I and others have stated is wrong is hooey.
Just come out and say you are unwilling to answer the question unambiguously. That's fine. Dancing around and misleading people I don't think is cool. Not when you present the facade that you don't hold anything back.
Clearly, MUCH is being held back. Too bad, this is hardly what Mr Hershey had in mind vis a vis paying it forward.
CLEARLY IT WASN'T.
I requested a definition that completely defines what peak volume is. I was told it was given.
IT WASN'T.
Spydertrader, long ago, stated in this journal he hid nothing about how he traded. Apparently that is no longer the case, and hasn't been for a long, long while. That's his choice. But to play games and insinuate that what I and others have stated is wrong is hooey.
Just come out and say you are unwilling to answer the question unambiguously. That's fine. Dancing around and misleading people I don't think is cool. Not when you present the facade that you don't hold anything back.
Clearly, MUCH is being held back. Too bad, this is hardly what Mr Hershey had in mind vis a vis paying it forward.
Looks like you have done some serious professional work in the past with idea boards,
nice work.
After a careful debrief, I can see that my lateral beginning at 10:20 was incorrect and should have started at 10:40. The 10:40 incr red vol confirms a pt3 at 10:35, and 10:55 is the signal for change (lat fbo with irv). We then have:
11:05 drv, hold long
11:10 irv and close inside prev bar, hold long
I hope that makes sense.
David
As I have told your two (and possibly more) usernames numerous times, if you don't like the way I present information, put me on ignore, and stop reading the thread.
Nothing you say or do has even the remote possibility of facilitating change on my end.
- Spydertrader