--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from gucci: 09-23-08 09:43 AM
IMHO. I actually thought that lateral and dominant (movements)are mutually exclusive?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What we are doing as we move from point 1 at 11 AM onwards is building first a tape then a traverse then a channel. What I will say in the next post and what I said last night in the long post is contingent upon there being a point 1 at 11 AM. Do you agree that there is a point 1 at 11 AM?
lj
Sorry for the delayed response. As you will have already seen, Romanus proposed a solution which says that:
1. There is no point 1 at 11:00 because of lack of sequence completion at that time.
2. There is a point 1 at 11:40 and that neatly takes care of the problem.
However my data vendor forced me to approach things differently but as intimated in Spyder's post (with chart) there is a way out of the 'data conundrum'. I have not looked at his chart in detail but will do so and as well the area in today's chart he referred to.
What I was trying to do with the "2-3 retrace thingy" was to reconcile what I was perceiving on a channel basis with, as it turns out, what was happening in the super channel, which was a 2-3 retrace. It is my current feeling that such heuristics are not the best way to do this and so I will look again till I figure out what I misperceived.
lj