Quote from Avi 8:
Sorry, this is wrong.
P.S. I don't read past your first sentence, if that. IMO You are too verbose for this setting.
This is a case of, to quote a higher power, "... you can call it a duck (or an albatross or whatever), it is what it is. So I'm going to call it a duck.
9:30-10:20 the upduck is completed, P1 and P2 are in place
10:20- this bar is the forming bar of an LM - a lateral duck begins
12:20 - we fail to BO on 2 bars of up V from the lateral duck. This bar is the forming bar of a new LM but we're still in a lateral duck.
13:30 - we fail to BO on 2 bars of up V from the lateral duck. This bar is the forming bar of a new LM but we're still in a lateral duck.
14:25 - we fail to BO on 2 bars of up V from the lateral duck. Since this is an inside bar, 14:20 becomes the forming bar of a new LM but we're still in a lateral duck.
14:35 -we fail to BO on 2 bars of up V from the lateral duck. This bar is the forming bar of a new LM but we're still in a lateral duck.
15:40 - we fail to BO on 2 bars of up V from the lateral duck. This bar is the forming bar of a new LM but we're still in a lateral duck.
15:55 - we end RTH and are still in a lateral duck.
Without getting into details, I end the day with the end of RTH at 16:00 ET.
So, IMO, we end the day still in a lateral duck aka a 2-3 lateral traverse. A traverse trader would have entered long at 9:30 -9:40 and stayed long all day till exiting near EOD perhaps with that "scary" looking OB at 15:50. Not too shabby with $1700/car and that's what it's all about.
lj
The chart is incomplete with no Gaussians or 'fine structure" as I was running about getting prep'd for some down time and did not annotate in real time.
I'll keep looking for that elusive 'something'