Iterative Refinement

[ljyoung]

Quote from Mr_Black:

so far so good

Thanks Mr. Black. You are too kind. You continue to confound the PA naysayers.

lj

 

[romanus]

Quote from Mr_Black:

so far so good

you're doing way better than me.

 

[gucci]

Quote from ljyoung:

Yoikks!! My son who is strikingly handsome (not from me I assure you) and isn't gay, has a very gay friend and isn't it neat that many of my generation have managed to get by that little bump in the road. Looks like that point 3 arrived and as Jack likes to say, "We have point 3" and now we look for other stuff having sat through the 2 to 3 movement.

lj

I don't know how to intepret your eloquent response... I just wanted to prop up a mood of the thread a little bit. Anyway, I'm not offended. The journey goes on...

 

[ljyoung]

Quote from gucci:

I don't know how to intepret your eloquent response... I just wanted to prop up a mood of the thread a little bit. Anyway, I'm not offended. The journey goes on...

Hey gucci, no implications intended and besides which I really couldn't care what someone's preference is. Doesn't seem to bother dolphins as John C. Lilly (the dude said he could talk with them) discovered a long time ago. Anyhows what I see now is us in another 2 to 3 LM with a price width of 3.5 points. I know Jack and Spyder could trade this puppy but I'm just a simple traverse trader (learning to be one that is), so I jest be waitin'.

lj

 

[gucci]

Spydertrader, would you call this market non-operating the last hour?
Edit: ljyoung, I'm lost in this market as well.

 

[ljyoung]

Quote from gucci:

Spydertrader, would you call this market non-operating the last hour?
Edit: ljyoung, I'm lost in this market as well.

I resent that implication gucci (just kidding) but it would be interesting to hear what Spyder has to say. All will become clear IF he gives us another EOD present.

lj

 

[Mr_Black]

Here is some of the clues help me to see ( Change) before price BO on red RTL traverse

 

[LittleMac]

Heres is a similar situation How do we know IN REAL TIME that it is not the neon green traverse as we have a dominant tape a retrace(pennant) followed by another dominant tape(both dominant tapes in royal blue) and that the Guassians are the thinner set of Guassians at the bottom as opposed to it being the neon blue traverse which corresponds to the thicker Guassians above the thinner ones.

I'm trying to stick with the bar by bar tapes way(dom, non-dom, dom) and I annotated the neon green traverse before the neon blue one could even exist.

 

[romanus]

Quote from icarus618:

... Trading is not an academic exercise. I'm like the farmer who gets his hands dirty ...

Thanks for the advice. I am finding that getting one's hands dirty actually helps seeing the signals with better clarity, even if after the fact. Even though your response was meant for the other person in may be a different context, but I am finding 'dirty hands' approach quite illuminating.

 

[ljyoung]

Quote from LittleMac:

Heres is a similar situation How do we know IN REAL TIME that it is not the neon green traverse as we have a dominant tape a retrace(pennant) followed by another dominant tape(both dominant tapes in royal blue) and that the Guassians are the thinner set of Guassians at the bottom as opposed to it being the neon blue traverse which corresponds to the thicker Guassians above the thinner ones.

I'm trying to stick with the bar by bar tapes way(dom, non-dom, dom) and I annotated the neon green traverse before the neon blue one could even exist.

Fan out the first RTL when in REAL TIME it gets penetrated by the down bar on decreased V.

lj