Quote from TIKITRADER:
I did have a point 2 to 3 non dominant of the traverse here.
Price broke out of the lateral on increasing balck on bar 46.
Price failed to get more increasing black over bars 47 and 48.
Bar 49 formed with decreased volatility and increased volume which is a signal for change on the tape level.
Since traverses are built from tapes this looked like change and a point 3 to form confirming the non dominant traverse.
Which did confirm once more increasing red volume came in as price decreased on bars 50 to 53.
I did see change as a pennant failed b/o on bar 55 with price decreasing on the bar on decreasing volume.
Change confirmed once lateral formation was b/o on increased black.
This is how I had seen that time, hope it is correct. If not . . . let me have it :eek:
Quote from Mr_Black:
Cell3 to Cell1 .... = channel reverse again and Hold
Quote from tobbe:
Why is the first bar for today red?
Quote from dkm:
Any particular reason why you did not annotate the 4 bars 10:45, 10:50, 10:55 and 11:00 (eob) as lat movement? Was it invalid to do so?
Quote from ljyoung:
TIKI,
Sorry for the delay but I had to eat. In addition to us not jibing with respect to bar #, I also think you misaligned your price and volume bars so as to make it appear like the LM breakout had failed. If this were the case, that it had failed, then I don't see how you could have 'escaped' from the LM.
Here is a snippet from the chart you posted, which I have referenced before and used in the earlier discussion:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113310&perpage=6&pagenumber=979
![]()
I have removed all time and bar # stuff and would ask that you let the eighth bar from the left of the snippet = my 'bar 50'. Then go to my post here:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113310&perpage=6&pagenumber=1091
and re-read what I said and see if you agree.
TIA
lj