Quote from LittleMac:
Romanus you think you could find any examples from past charts of the last three situations(i.e. increasing volume appears to confirm pt 3 but comes from 1. RTL Break 2. Formation BO/FBO 3. Spike Bar
Much obliged.
Try this one for Formation BO:
---------------------------------------------
07-26-08 01:41 AM
Quote from Spydertrader:
The Bar to which you refer in your questions represents the only FTT of the day. Price spent the remainder of the day in a down Traverse. In addition, the bar represents an FTT on a Traverse and not a channel. With respect to your Lilac colored annotations, note how increasing black formed at these points (formation break outs).
While I have no doubt others also had drawn in Traverses which simply do not exist one can know this connot be correct by asking oneself, 'What signal for change caused me to reverse short either on the 13:05 or the 13:10 [close of] ES Bar?" (Only using the ES and no medium or fine level tools.)
Hint: There isn't one. And if there isn't one there to get the trader back short, then there must not have been one to place the trader on the long side of the market previously.
Subtle differences exist which require the trader to use differentiation in order to make note of how these changes effect what must come next.
As a result, a Traverse Level Trader entered the day long at 9:55 AM [close of] ES Bar, and reversed short at 11:00 AM [close] ES Bar - holding until End of Day. The market provided no other signals for change - for those trading on the traverses.
I understand how people might think they had a Point Three (simply by watching Volume), but the reality is, today the increasing volume developed primarily from Formation Break Outs. This does not a trend make.
In addition, without a signal for change the traverse simply continues (even though the market required it fan ever so slightly at 13:05).
HTH
- Spydertrader
