Quote from dkm:
Was my decision to fan the rtl incorrect?
Quote from dkm:
What is the purpose of the line joining the low of the 12:20 bar and the close of the 12:25 bar that you annotated as pt3?
Quote from dkm:
I was also surprised to see that the 13:05 bar was not considered to be an FTT of the orange traverse.
Quote from Spydertrader:
Perhaps, you can eliminate your own surprise by telling me what signal for change exists at the time you mention.
- Spydertrader
Quote from dkm:
I see that price failed to reach the left trend line.
Quote from dkm:
We have a change from price moving down to price moving laterally
Quote from dkm:
which I understood to be change.
Quote from dkm:
We have price forming a higher high on the next bar which has been described to me in the past as change.
Quote from dkm:
We got rtl bo on decreasing vol which I understood meant that the rtl should be fanned. It seems I was wrong on all counts.
Quote from Spydertrader:
Again, Jokari Window says what on this bar?
You also had a down traverse (Dominant) followed by a small up Traverse (non-dominant). What do you think must come next after such an event, combined with a signal for change on the non dominant traverse?
- Spydertrader
Quote from dkm:
On the 13:05 bar, I don't know what jokari says because price has not moved up or down relative to the close of the previous bar.![]()
Quote from dkm:
After a dom short traverse and a non dom long traverse I would expect another dom short traverse.
Quote from Spydertrader:
Apply some critical thinking to the problem at hand. The Jokari Window indicates what is change. Does this scenario fit with what the Jokari Window says is a signal for change?
- Spydertrader
Quote from dkm:
I presume you are implying that if there is no change in price then jokari cannot give a change signal so the net result is no change. I am now wondering why the FTT on the attached clip is different.
Quote from Spydertrader:
Thank-you for providing an example of how a failure to thoroughly annotate a chart can lead to confusion. By adding the missing Lateral Formation, you should easily see a different context with this example compared to the example under discussion this morning.
- Spydertrader