Iterative Refinement

Quote from Spydertrader:

Still no differences?

I see that one has tapes in opposing directions.

Can the leap be made that a traverse must be formed by two tapes that form in opposing directions?

The only difference I can see is that your past chart has traverses (or whatever they are) annotated that do not have a tape in opposing direction.

I thought that a tape in one direction, followed by lateral movement, then increasing volume and another tape in the same direction could form a traverse. Is this correct?
 
Quote from icarus618:

On 5m bars:

Q: What is the minimum number of bars needed to draw 2 parallel lines (points 1,2,3)?

A: 2.

Two bars give 4 end points. You use 3 of them to get the lines. There are exceptions to this, which everyone here knows.

When you draw the lines off 2 5m bars, you can bet your ass that is not the "best" channel to operate on. I use the word "best" here from the viewpoint of a beginner whose focus should be on growing his account and building up confidence. Call that channel a traverse. Oftentimes the 2 bars are similar in volatility. The bars that follow will be too. Give this an additional name: a tape. But don't forget, the channel you just drew is a traverse.

Q: What is the minimum number of traverses needed to draw 2 (wider) parallel lines?

A: 2.

Two traverses give 4 end points (one overlaps). You use 3 of them to get the lines. If the second traverse exceeds the extreme of the first, you wait for the next traverse.

This is the "best" channel to operate on. In Spydertrader's examples, this is the red channel. Look for the "best" places to extract from this channel. Again, I'm using "best" here from the perspective of a person looking to grow his account and build confidence.


Based on this definition of a channel, here is my annotation of the 5 minute chart of UYG:

I see a blue uptrending channel within a green uptrending channel into the close.

So far, after hours is showing price within the blue uptrending channel.

There's a bunch of other lines showing in the chart when I zoom in to the 5 minute chart (the lines from the daily annotation are carried over).

I'm trying to figure out how to increase the bars (while trying to capture the bigger picture).
 

Attachments

Quote from Jander:

I see that one has tapes in opposing directions.

Interestingly, where once you could not see, now you can. Where once no differences existed, now differences exist.

Quote from Jander:

Can the leap be made that a traverse must be formed by two tapes that form in opposing directions?

No. A traverse (and a channel) requires three components.

Quote from Jander:

The only difference I can see is that your past chart has traverses (or whatever they are) annotated that do not have a tape in opposing direction.

Then, at your current skill set, these annotations would not represent traverses as they do not have the necessary components required for you to 'see' them as such.

Quote from Jander:

I thought that a tape in one direction, followed by lateral movement, then increasing volume and another tape in the same direction could form a traverse. Is this correct?

The description you provide has three components: Dominant, Non-dominant and another Dominant component. I bet channels work the same way, but instead of tapes as the building blocks, the traverses now play that role.

- Spydertrader
 
Quote from Ares1:

Based on this definition of a channel, here is my annotation of the 5 minute chart of UYG:

I see a blue uptrending channel within a green uptrending channel into the close.

So far, after hours is showing price within the blue uptrending channel.

There's a bunch of other lines showing in the chart when I zoom in to the 5 minute chart (the lines from the daily annotation are carried over).

I'm trying to figure out how to increase the bars (while trying to capture the bigger picture).

Here is the wider view of the 5 minute chart:
 

Attachments

Quote from Ares1:

Based on this definition of a channel, here is my annotation of the 5 minute chart of UYG:

I encourage you to review the Channels for Building Wealth document linked from the beginning of this Journal. I also encourage you to review the 'Flaws and Formations' Section of last year's Futures Journal (also linked from page one of this thread). Lastly, I encourage you to stick to one timeframe (daily for equities) for your annotations so your brain can become properly calibrated.

- Spydertrader
 
Quote from Spydertrader:

I answered this question in response to PointOne.

Without the formation of traverses, one cannot have a channel, and since no traverses formed prior to the 11:00 AM [close of] ES bar, then we cannot have witnessed a channel form. We can only have a traverse.

Period.


A corrected chart snippet.
 

Attachments

Quote from Spydertrader:

I encourage you to increase bar spacing and set your scale more appropriately, so that others may have an easier time of actually 'seeing' what your charts and annotations say. In addition, using OHLC charts, rather than candle charts should increase the number of responses you receive.



By time the 'golden cross' has occurred, you have already missed much of what your chart (Price and Volume) needs to tell you.

- Spydertrader

I guess I was trying to see what will come next after price created what looks like a point 3 for the thick green channel.
 

Attachments

Quote from Spydertrader:

I encourage you to review the Channels for Building Wealth document linked from the beginning of this Journal. I also encourage you to review the 'Flaws and Formations' Section of last year's Futures Journal (also linked from page one of this thread). Lastly, I encourage you to stick to one timeframe (daily for equities) for your annotations so your brain can become properly calibrated.

- Spydertrader

I just read this post.

Ty. I will review it.
 
I wish to have something clarified on this chart which Spydertrader posted:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2008336

The area labeled "Lateral Movement", is actually a lateral formation along with a FFBO (formation failed b/o). In the past, Spyder has specified that differences which exist between LM and LF and assist in seeing the sequences. Now, it appears as though no differences exist, as one is being labeled as the other.

Was the labeling an error? Something else?

QUIZ on BAR 6: does the answer have anything to do with the "fact" that no dominant movement, in the case of this traverse dominant movent being a tape, that no dominant movent (or tape) has yet to see decreaing volume? Sorry for wording, it's only a hazy thing in my head at the moment.
 
Quote from gravitonium77:
"The area labeled "Lateral Movement", is actually a lateral formation "


Lateral formations contain all bars. Does this lateral contain all bars?
Bar 4 exceeds the high of bar 1, changing it from a lateral formation to lateral movement
 
Back
Top