Iterative Refinement

[romanus]

Quote from Spydertrader:

BTW, I referred to the red up channel in my previous post in case any confusion existed.

Yes, the nature of 1010 [close of] bar and how the price behaved inside it prevents it from placing both pt1 and pt2 on it's high and low

Quote from Spydertrader:

The market confirmed the blue down channel.

Yes, 1135 [close of] broke out of the blue channel on increasing black volume.

Quote from Spydertrader:

The market did not confirm your chubby tape.

By not creating new pt3 down.

 

[Mr_Black]

ES... what a slow day

 

[Mr_Black]

YM...

 

[astral]

Quote from Mr_Black:

YM...

Due to wrong annotations on my chart, I didn't expected the drop, which just occurred. I went looking where the mistake was, and it became back crystal clear. (Focused a bit more on:

(1-2-3-ftt) 1 -- (1-2-3-ftt) 2 --(1-2-3-ftt) 3 -- (1-2-3) ftt. It allows me to become clibrated at not only must come next, but also how strong or weak it will come)

 

[Spydertrader]

Quote from astral:

Due to wrong annotations on my chart, I didn't expected the drop, which just occurred.

If only someone had taken the time to warn you in advance how thoughly annotating a chart assists in error avoidance.

I try to thank those who provide proof of my earlier points.

Thanks, once again, for providing yet another opportunity for me to do so.

- Spydertrader

 

[astral]

Quote from Spydertrader:

If only someone had taken the time to warn you in advance how thoughly annotating a chart assists in error avoidance.

I try to thank those who provide proof of my earlier points.

Thanks, once again, for providing yet another opportunity for me to do so.

- Spydertrader

It's my pleasure, spyder, but don't get me wrong.
I was not looking at volume, get that straight, purely relying on the fractal within fractal.

On my ES it was crystal clear what was coming up looking at volume (cheating)
Just saying, spyder. It ain't always what you think it is.

 

[Spydertrader]

Quote from astral:

Just saying, spyder. It ain't always what you think it is.

When you allow your arrogance to override your common sense, its exactly what I think it is.

You've once again proved my point.

When one chooses not to follow step one of the process (generating thoroughly annotated charts), and instead, chooses to 'invent' their own methodology, errors result. Those errors become the sole responsibility of the trader who made the decision - irrespective of whatever fractal level of rationalization a trader wishes to post.

We all know what a smart guy you are (you've told us many times). Unfortunately, your actions have yet to confirm your assertions. As such, what you do speaks so loudly, people can no longer hear what you say.

You have provided a classic example of someone who needs to be right. If you cannot find a lesson in that example, my hope is, others can walk away with one.

- Spydertrader

 

[Avi 8]

Quote from astral:

...I was not looking at volume, get that straight...

Oh we got it 'straight', you simply don't follow what is presented here.

I will add my thanks also for proving my earlier points.

 

[Avi 8]

Quote from astral:

... I'm working my ass of the show you results which will make you bow...

Please let me know if I bow now.

 

[astral]

It appears every times I do something out of the box, "the members" seem to project their issues on me. I wish to not argue with you.
I really respect the work you've done, remarkable stuff, no doubt. But this is where it ends to me.

To end this, reread my last sentence in the last post.
I hope I can still post in this thread after this little rant. Please don't let your ego respond to this comment. I have no intent to fight.

ps:Avi8, that last comment is also directed to you, obviously.