Iterative Refinement

I was wondering if anyone could take a look at the chart of VISN(daily) and tell me their thoughts or interpretation. The volume today was heavy increasing black but the price barely moved. Was there an inner-bar Guassian shift on the daily bar. Should I be cautious come Monday seeing that I'm still in(long from 15.65).

Any comments would be helpful.
 
Quote from treeline:

Today's ES.

Romanus, I saw your comment about the chubby tape. I'll study up on the concept when I get home to see if I misunderstand it. Meanwhile, I found another area which I perceived as a chubby tape late in the session.

Treeline, I apologize for the confusion that may have created. The comment I made:
Quote from romanus:

I don't think I can draw a 'chubby' tape where you shown on your chart. If I try drawing it with pt1 and pt2 on the bar 8 (inside bar), then the high of bar 10 (incr black) where one would put pt3 is higher than LTL that goes through pt2.

is not accurate.

I have reviewed Spydertrader's charts and have found multiple instances of annotating a tape (or taped channel) in such a way that the bar upon which falls pt3 also creates VE. I marked them with large yellow arrow pointers in the attachments.
 

Attachments

Tape = Two Price Bars with 2 of the 3 points (Point 1, Point 2 & Point 3) on one of the two Price Bars.

'Chubby' Tape = Minimum of Three Price Bars with Point One and Point Two on the same Price Bar with Point Three located minimum two Price Bars into the future.

Channel / Traverse = Minimum of Three Price Bars with Point One, Point Two & Point Three located on three different Price Bars.

FT3 = Where Point Three, Increasing Volume and an FTT all converge on the exact same Price and Volume Bar.

- Spydertrader
 
Quote from Spydertrader:

Tape = Two Price Bars with 2 of the 3 points (Point 1, Point 2 & Point 3) on one of the two Price Bars.

'Chubby' Tape = Minimum of Three Price Bars with Point One and Point Two on the same Price Bar with Point Three located minimum two Price Bars into the future.

Channel / Traverse = Minimum of Three Price Bars with Point One, Point Two & Point Three located on three different Price Bars.

FT3 = Where Point Three, Increasing Volume and an FTT all converge on the exact same Price and Volume Bar.

- Spydertrader

Thank you so much!!!!

I have been going through Futures Thread and Hershey's Channel Document for the last few days trying to define them in those exact terms.

Thank you again.
 
It was exactly two months ago that
Spyder told me to crawl, walk, run (http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...dertrader+cunparis+walk+run+crawl#post1807702) so I thought it would be a good time to ask for some input on my journey.

In that 2 months time I decided to temporarily put the Hershey equities on hold and do the futures journal. This was mainly because I've been using the IBD approach to equities for the past 2 years and felt comfortable with that which let me focus on something new. Also at the time the market was in a down trend which wasn't a good time to go long on stocks.

I've now made it to the end of the month on str/squ. I've made a lot of progress and I feel there are just a few things that are holding me back. And it is here that I'd like to get some feedback. I want to allow myself all the time it takes to become proficient in the tools that I have before adding more (DOM is the next chapter but I'm waiting a bit).

I'm finding that I'm able to find FTTs but there is just one small problem. Often I find an FTT and I reverse (I'm up to using a simulator). The prices moves a bit in the new direction and then reverses to make another attempt at the LTL. So I reverse, thinking what I saw wasn't an FTT. And usually I end up being proven right in my original FTT call and the price will then reverse again and go towards the RTL, so I reverse again. In theory it's all good but in reality I find that I often lose 50-100 dollars on each reverse, so that I often get down $200. I know that one shouldn't be concerned with P&L at this point, but at the same time I feel like the sim is telling me I'm a bit off. I have heard/read that Spyder will only lose a few ticks. I'm not sure how to do that.

Here is an example from Friday's ES:

5pj26n


At the first yellow circle at 10:35 I thought I had an FTT. In hindsight I'm not exactly sure why, in hindsight it looks like we couldn't confirm it until 2 bars later at 10:45 when volume dropped. I ended up reversing in the middle of the 2nd bar there (10:40) and went long. Then on the 3rd bar at 10:45 I thought I was wrong and I reversed again to go short. Then I realized that it was really an FTT and reversed yet again. I forgot how much the reversing cost me but it was around $200 or more I think. The other problem with this approach is that the entry point (the last reverse) is often too high and then the pt 3 of the new channel can drop below the entry. Overall it doesn't seem like a good situation.

So my question is did I miss anything that could have helped me to have a better reversal? And when one reverses and then you think you were wrong, how many ticks do you let it go against you?

This is actually the situation from the 2nd yellow circile at 11:10. I didn't want a repeat of the first yellow circle area so I figured I'd reverse sooner and if even if I'm wrong I could as Spyder says wash or even make a few ticks. I thought it was an FTT on the volume peak. But I was proven wrong.

For this one, I thought "let's just see what'll happen" and I didn't reverse. It dropped more and went over 200 euros against me. I was chatting with another participant here and he hadn't reversed so it was interesting cause we were chatting together, we both agreed on what was happening, yet I was long and he was short!

Since volume was not increasing I held my long position and finally at 11:25 it started going up and my $200 deficit quickly erased and because a very nice profit (I exited shortly after it left the channel, I had to take the lunch break).

now I don't think it's good to let a trade go against you $200, but at the same time getting whipped around reversing isn't good either. So I'm hoping that someone can offer some advice or insight to help me see what I'm missing.

A similar situation for me is the pt3. Often I think "ok I see decreasing volume, it's really low, this could be a pt 3, etc. and I enter. And then the price continues the direction it was going (against my position) but I hold. It sometimes go against me but usually I was just a little early in my pt3 and it ends up ok except for my entry wasn't as good as it could be. It's really the same situation as with the FTT I believe.

I remember bundlemaker saying Spyder told him to wait until 2 (or was it 1? I forget and can't find the post) bars after the FTT. But usually by then the entry is too risky.

I feel like if I can spot the pt 3 & ftt ok, it's just a question of timing. I think once I get the timing worked out then I'll be doing much better. It's just these bad entries that are causing me grief.

Sorry for the long post but I've really been doing a lot of work on this reading, practicing, studying, etc. It's hard doing the journal without being able to participate with everyone. Most of my questions do get answered in the journal but I think sometimes a bit of personal coaching/guidance is necessary to get over the hump.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the futures journal.

cunparis

PS: If anyone is going through the futures journal and would like to share experiences and problems, please PM me. I've already had one other person PM me and we've traded together a couple times and I can't tell you how valuable that has been for me. To bounce ideas around and talk it out. Very helpful and a lot of fun. I hope there are others.
 
Hello,

Just a few tips.

I think your annotations are not sufficient:

- It's okay to draw tapes but I wonder if you really know the difference between a tape and a channel as it doesn't show in your chart and you use the same colors for tapes and channels. Be more precise and draw everything. Don't miss anything.

- You miss channels. Every time you get increasing volume: Draw a new channel. Doing this helps you to understand what's going on. (for example when that channel is broken you expect point 2 and 3, etc). For example 10:05 - 10:15 form an upchannel but you only drew a tape.

- Annotate pennants and laterals. They also help to understand what's going on and imo are an essential element of the method. Doing this (plus understanding what's going on) you would have easily held after the 10:40 FTT and reversed/exited somewhere in the 11:00 bar as it formed an FBO (on decr. black) and you would have pocketed a point or 2. (providing you understand quickly what's going on). First understand completely what's going on and then learn to be quick btw. All these things you don't see if you don't annotate.

- Be careful reversing. SCT is not an option at this stage. Make a difference between exiting and reversing. Exit if not sure and wait for pt3 to re-enter in the other direction. If you reverse and you're wrong you are wrong twice.

Regarding 11:15. Nothing happens here.... Price just went up a few ticks and closed lower in your direction. No reason to exit and even less to go long. Change did not announce itself. There's is only anticipation of change at the end of the bar which materialized at 11:20.

Hope this helps.
Ivo


Quote from cunparis:

It was exactly two months ago that
Spyder told me to crawl, walk, run (http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...dertrader+cunparis+walk+run+crawl#post1807702) so I thought it would be a good time to ask for some input on my journey.

In that 2 months time I decided to temporarily put the Hershey equities on hold and do the futures journal. This was mainly because I've been using the IBD approach to equities for the past 2 years and felt comfortable with that which let me focus on something new. Also at the time the market was in a down trend which wasn't a good time to go long on stocks.

I've now made it to the end of the month on str/squ. I've made a lot of progress and I feel there are just a few things that are holding me back. And it is here that I'd like to get some feedback. I want to allow myself all the time it takes to become proficient in the tools that I have before adding more (DOM is the next chapter but I'm waiting a bit).

I'm finding that I'm able to find FTTs but there is just one small problem. Often I find an FTT and I reverse (I'm up to using a simulator). The prices moves a bit in the new direction and then reverses to make another attempt at the LTL. So I reverse, thinking what I saw wasn't an FTT. And usually I end up being proven right in my original FTT call and the price will then reverse again and go towards the RTL, so I reverse again. In theory it's all good but in reality I find that I often lose 50-100 dollars on each reverse, so that I often get down $200. I know that one shouldn't be concerned with P&L at this point, but at the same time I feel like the sim is telling me I'm a bit off. I have heard/read that Spyder will only lose a few ticks. I'm not sure how to do that.

Here is an example from Friday's ES:

5pj26n


At the first yellow circle at 10:35 I thought I had an FTT. In hindsight I'm not exactly sure why, in hindsight it looks like we couldn't confirm it until 2 bars later at 10:45 when volume dropped. I ended up reversing in the middle of the 2nd bar there (10:40) and went long. Then on the 3rd bar at 10:45 I thought I was wrong and I reversed again to go short. Then I realized that it was really an FTT and reversed yet again. I forgot how much the reversing cost me but it was around $200 or more I think. The other problem with this approach is that the entry point (the last reverse) is often too high and then the pt 3 of the new channel can drop below the entry. Overall it doesn't seem like a good situation.

So my question is did I miss anything that could have helped me to have a better reversal? And when one reverses and then you think you were wrong, how many ticks do you let it go against you?

This is actually the situation from the 2nd yellow circile at 11:10. I didn't want a repeat of the first yellow circle area so I figured I'd reverse sooner and if even if I'm wrong I could as Spyder says wash or even make a few ticks. I thought it was an FTT on the volume peak. But I was proven wrong.

For this one, I thought "let's just see what'll happen" and I didn't reverse. It dropped more and went over 200 euros against me. I was chatting with another participant here and he hadn't reversed so it was interesting cause we were chatting together, we both agreed on what was happening, yet I was long and he was short!

Since volume was not increasing I held my long position and finally at 11:25 it started going up and my $200 deficit quickly erased and because a very nice profit (I exited shortly after it left the channel, I had to take the lunch break).

now I don't think it's good to let a trade go against you $200, but at the same time getting whipped around reversing isn't good either. So I'm hoping that someone can offer some advice or insight to help me see what I'm missing.

A similar situation for me is the pt3. Often I think "ok I see decreasing volume, it's really low, this could be a pt 3, etc. and I enter. And then the price continues the direction it was going (against my position) but I hold. It sometimes go against me but usually I was just a little early in my pt3 and it ends up ok except for my entry wasn't as good as it could be. It's really the same situation as with the FTT I believe.

I remember bundlemaker saying Spyder told him to wait until 2 (or was it 1? I forget and can't find the post) bars after the FTT. But usually by then the entry is too risky.

I feel like if I can spot the pt 3 & ftt ok, it's just a question of timing. I think once I get the timing worked out then I'll be doing much better. It's just these bad entries that are causing me grief.

Sorry for the long post but I've really been doing a lot of work on this reading, practicing, studying, etc. It's hard doing the journal without being able to participate with everyone. Most of my questions do get answered in the journal but I think sometimes a bit of personal coaching/guidance is necessary to get over the hump.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the futures journal.

cunparis

PS: If anyone is going through the futures journal and would like to share experiences and problems, please PM me. I've already had one other person PM me and we've traded together a couple times and I can't tell you how valuable that has been for me. To bounce ideas around and talk it out. Very helpful and a lot of fun. I hope there are others.
 
Quote from cunparis:

...(I'm up to using a simulator)...
Well congrats!
That is amazing progress for just a couple months!

Simming is the last step, the 'A' in MADA.

So that means one is proficient in 'M' (properly annotated chart).

Also, one has mastered 'A' (context, all sequences, and WMCN)

Then one has moved to a mastery of 'D' (can I take a trade?, do I want to take a trade? what is my level of trading? [just FTT to FTT rules as stated in futures jrnl 1, or full blown SCT?])

Then comes the last 'A' (simming to practice pushing buttons and then moving to live trading, but only after mastering simming)

These steps are to be accomplised in order. Notice the layout of the futures journal. The syllabus was laid out in this fashion. Now that does not mean one only needs one month to accomplish 'M'. I don't remember a guarantee of sucess in only the one year to be proficient to trade. A length of one year was chosen to get through all the material, but one must spend as much time as needed on each step individually. For example: Me, took me a year to learn 'M', not as long for 'A', not as long again for 'D', etc.

Simming, live trading or anything else NOT accomplished in this order results in one thing: Delay in mastery of MADA. (Which is why it took me a year on 'M'). Feel free to make the same mistake I did.

I see Ivo has offered some very good tips, perhaps the journey should start there. Another tip: go through the steps only using ES and YM, nothing else is needed until MADA is mastered at this level.

Good luck and good trading to you.

-Mike
 
Back
Top