Quote from romanus:
Am I correct in assuming that the definition of the forest channel is that it consists of dominant and non-dominant traverses which are pt3 tapes.
No tapes form traverses (think Trees, not Forest). Traverses form Channels (Channels are your Forest).
Quote from romanus:
Because if I apply this logic here I arrive at a nice blue down channel built from pt3 tapes, except I have to treat the outside bar as black bar and that will give me incr. black to confirm the channel. But itâs an outside bar?????????
The outside Bar was once increasing red before it became an outside bar and ended increasing black.
Quote from romanus:
Guidance is needed here please.
I specifically pointed you to the grey down channel at the beginning of the day. You have a Point Two labeled where Price touches no trend line. Let's talk about this section of your chart (where you indicated you would have reversed into what you should have [at the time] only looked at as Point Two to Point Three). Now, why were you reversing here again, and why do you have a channel (Points One two and Three labelled across a minimum of three bars) annotated? You may have subsequently described this area as a 'tape' but it is not labelled (nor annotated) as such. A tape uses two bars for three of the points - differenciated from the 'chubby tape' by Points One and Two on bar One while Point Three falls two bars later.
- Spydertrader