Quote from astral:
Okay, todd, I'd like to ask just couple of questions. I hate doing this, but here goes:
Following convention isn't one of your strong suits is it? Neither does 'following advice' rank high among your list of priorities. Whether its adhering to strict scientific guidelines for learning the methods discussed, internalizng the process in order to devlop sports memory, or even, addressing the OP in a cavalier fashion, you've shown (through your posts) an inability to follow directions (Remiiiiind you of anyone? [said in the best Craig Ferguson voice possible]) . To that end, why continue to ask for advice which history indicates you have absolutely no intention of following?
Quote from astral:
I'd like to know why: 1: when I see major green/red volume rushing in T/S, how come price goes into the opposite directing, better yet, sometimes it doesn't. I know *context* is in play, but just a little hint would be really appreciated.
I encourage you to review posts which specifically discuss how the P-V Relationship operates on the DOM Level. However, since I have
yet to see you post a thoroughly annotated chart, perhaps you should focus on the 'M' portion of the M-A-D-A paradigm before moving on towards complexity. After all, if one cannot grasp the 'simple' things, how can one expect to grasp higher level concepts?
Quote from astral:
I'd like to know why:2: yesterday on the "thoothpick" bar, price reallied up 2points on "NO VOLUME", and then dropped down 15points. This happens 20times a day on micro level. What's the catch? How the interpret this?
I'd recheck my data if I were you. Also, why operate at the molecular level when you appear (again through your posts) to have an inability to 'see' the forest through the trees.
Quote from astral:
I know YM would give me signals, as Stretch squeeze would, but I don't care about signals. I prefer *getting* it.
While you may
prefer 'getting it' you certainly don't appear willing to do the requisite work which facilitates the process of 'getting it.' Second, if you
know something happens, perhaps you could focus on
when something happens, and therein, find the why.
Quote from astral:
ps: One little hint is all I ask, I'm serious though, I want to re-invent the wheel.
I've provided more than just a 'hint' spanning 4 full journals. Someone with such a high level of intellect would have come across such things during their purposeful learning. If your goal is to "reinvent the wheel," then by all means feel free to do so, but
you get to do that work. I've done mine already.
Quote from astral:
:edit: now that I look at it, the 2point rally was on pretty high volume, but my question still remains, though
Which question still remains? The one where reality differed greatly from your assertion, or the one where you fabricated the critical data required to make a decision and ignoried the sufficient data set (and context) provided by the market?
Why not start (where all great journeys start) at the
beginning, rather than, jump ahead because you're 'smarter than the average bear.' Many of us have already seen that act, and I for one, have no desire to 'see' it again - especially since so many 'get it' by following the path already prescribed, rather than, inventing a new one.
- Spydertrader