Iterative Refinement

Quote from guavaman:

(2) RTL
(3) VE
(4) ES Formation
(5) ES Forming a Formation
(6) ES lateral

and the champion is...

(7) ES Forming a lateral :D
More...

:D Nice going. Guavaman is champion!!

To Recap
Here's when we have permission to look at the YM:

1) Volatility Expansion
2) Pennant
3) Lateral
4) Left Trend Line
5) Right Trend Line
6) A Forming Pennant
7) A Forming Lateral
 
Quote from guavaman:

(2) RTL
(3) VE
(4) ES Formation
(5) ES Forming a Formation
(6) ES lateral

and the champion is...

(7) ES Forming a lateral :D
More...

ES Formation = Pennants and Lateral Formation
ES Lateral = Lateral Movement or as rechristened by Spyder = Lateral Channel
Correct?
How does one interpret a Formation within a Lateral Channel? How does one interpret an outside bar within a Lateral Channel?
Answer to both questions, for me = me not know for sure but me have an idea for one of them - check the YM.

lj
 

Attachments

Quote from Tums:

I will start...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) LTL
(2) when ES is at extremes
(3) anticipate BO of a penant or lateral
(4) RTL
(5) VE
(6) FTT?

and the champion is...

(7) We are all champions :D
More...
 
Quote from ljyoung:

...for me = me not know for sure...
More...
How can one know when to go to the YM, if one's chart is not properly annotated?

The posted chart is missing many LTLs, VEs, and RTLs. Also, the one leading 'indicator' we DO use, is missing - the gaussians.

The two RTLs that are drawn don't seem to provide much help and aren't really supported by - guess what - gaussians.

Not sure what that squiggly stuff is at the bottom.


My point? The answers are on your screen, please take some time and look for them using the tools presented in the futures journal.
 
Quote from FerdinandAlx:

If the going is long, stay long. If it's short, short. The method has provided you with the necessary means to identify turning points, so a fear of seeing the trend turn against you is irrational. In the absense of a turning point, you have to be in the trend.
More...

Its the interpretation of the turning points that is the problem here. Not fearing a turning point.
 
Quote from Avi 8:

How can one know when to go to the YM, if one's chart is not properly annotated?

The posted chart is missing many LTLs, VEs, and RTLs. Also, the one leading 'indicator' we DO use, is missing - the gaussians.

The two RTLs that are drawn don't seem to provide much help and aren't really supported by - guess what - gaussians.

Not sure what that squiggly stuff is at the bottom.


My point? The answers are on your screen, please take some time and look for them using the tools presented in the futures journal.
More...

A quote which will hopefully settle the differences of opinion about what is sufficiently annotative:

I do my thing, and you do your thing. I am not in this world to live up to your expectations, and you are not in this world to live up to mine. You are you, and I am me. If by chance we meet, it's beautiful. If not, it can't be helped.

Fritz Perls

Which is to say that it is singularly immaterial to me what you have decided should be done with respect to annotation. I am not presenting myself or my posts or my annotations as a paradigm for what others should do. If you wish to do so with your thread offerings, please do so but kindly keep any implied necessity that I do what you do, to yourself.

If, due to the fact that my pictorial posts are substandard (by your criteria), a state of confusion is being generated in other members of this thread, then let them say so. The name of the thread is "Iterative Refinement" not "Reiterative Refinement" and while one might quibble about what refinement means, the pedantic screed that you keep passing my way is tiresome at best.

lj
 
Quote from ljyoung:

...it is singularly immaterial to me what you have decided should be done with respect to annotation...
More...
I haven't decided anything, it is the MARKET that made the decision.

These are not arbitrary lines and points of change that I decided; that would be extremely naive and arrogant.

This geometry has been decided by the MARKET. It is never wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top