Iterative Refinement
- Thread starter Spydertrader
- Start date
Quote from Spydertrader:
Much better, but now your trend lines became sloppy - creating a risk of missing something important. Did you find the missing (future) case from your first attempt?
I am precise when I work with robotics, but most other things I have to work at it.
The last form of continue would be even harmonic.
gooch87
A significant part of your analysis/explanation is predicated on the end of one day start of the next context, correct? I did not realize we were given this information for the drill.
Yes and the PV relationship states that increasing volume is required for dominant price movement (on that fractal).
This is due to the superposition (addition) of the faster fractals. Without annotating gaussians on at least 2 fractals there will be ambiguity. e.g. the chart shows increasing red but to you it is non-dom decreasing red volume. You have processed context over and above the raw price and volume data. Later you show increasing black to fit with the P3, but volume is decreasing!
I don't want to drag this out unnecessarily as the drill has served its purpose, and if everyone is happy with your explanations please move on.
I've been happily extracting with my current level of understanding and I will continue to do so while I mull over your explanation.
Yes and the PV relationship states that increasing volume is required for dominant price movement (on that fractal).
This is due to the superposition (addition) of the faster fractals. Without annotating gaussians on at least 2 fractals there will be ambiguity. e.g. the chart shows increasing red but to you it is non-dom decreasing red volume. You have processed context over and above the raw price and volume data. Later you show increasing black to fit with the P3, but volume is decreasing!
I don't want to drag this out unnecessarily as the drill has served its purpose, and if everyone is happy with your explanations please move on.
I've been happily extracting with my current level of understanding and I will continue to do so while I mull over your explanation.
Congrats on your current level of success. I have no doubt you'll see it eventually.
- Spydertrader
Excellent observation.
- Spydertrader
Was seeing several ways to annotate this mornings action. This is what I chose.
EDIT: The other annotation option I was considering would have depended on whether one considered Fridays final traverse a PT3, if so then we opened Lat (non-dom) and completed dom traverse down with (PT1 at 1015 & PT3 at 1050) which would mean we have completed down channel seq @ 1100.
This is a dilemma for me and I will be mindful of this when considering the sequences
EDIT: The other annotation option I was considering would have depended on whether one considered Fridays final traverse a PT3, if so then we opened Lat (non-dom) and completed dom traverse down with (PT1 at 1015 & PT3 at 1050) which would mean we have completed down channel seq @ 1100.
This is a dilemma for me and I will be mindful of this when considering the sequences
So far