I think you are correct. I was attempting to compare apples to auto parts by failing to differentiate between Dominant and Non-Dominant Price Movement.Quote from treeline:
If I understand romanus correctly, you don't see where the morning up Traverse is confirmed by more increasing Volume after 10:55 EST BOs the LM on IBV. The way I viewed it, 11:05 EST provides confirmation of the P3 up Traverse. Yes, it's a Spike Bar, but up is already dominant at this point. I don't recall Spydertrader saying that all Spike Bars on increasing Volume are to be considered as non-dominant movement. I do recall him saying that we can see increasing Volume if a Spike Bar occurs during a non-dominant Point 2 to 3 retrace. But in this case, the market has already created what we might call a "provisional" Point 3, which only needs to be confirmed by more IBV. The 11:05 bar provides more IBV which doesn't come from a Lateral BO or FBO.
Hopefully Spydertrader or someone else will correct me if I'm leading you astray.
This morning was a text-book Lateral BO causing Pace Acceleration, after which one expects market to move laterally in an effort to create an Accelerated Traverse.
As I noted earlier more practice required on my part to see these things immediately as they unfold and not after it's over.
EDIT:
If one were to annotate that first Lateral of the day as I did, the market creates pt3 and then closes back inside lateral. Dominant black moving laterally can be found in pt1 to pt2 movements.
Spydertrader also mentioned that "what lateral provided for me, he saw elsewhere". It may be the increasing red bars prior to the 10:15 [close of] bar (pt3) which are found when price moves towards pt1 of the future up channel.
Damn, every bar tells the story. This is like learning a new language.
