Iterative Refinement

I don' t get any of this resolution/fractal stuff. Tapes build traverses and traverses build channels. Beyond that I see no practical utility. 1220 creates a Ve in the blue pt3 up. So i expect an accelerated traverse. I do get one, but then the accel traverse gets a VE itself on 1310. Should I expect another accel traverse or not? Didn't get one, but why? This shit appears quite random to me.

I do hear you. My very being is stretched so far at times between nirvana and hell that, like a rubber band, something has to give, and when it does I'm either going to end up happy or insane. ((smiley ommited out of respect for those brethren who do not like them), another smiley here)

I don't know if you should expect another Acc T.
You could but then it's like that geeza fellow told us about dominos.

You can take it bar by bar in terms of WMCN for there to be one or not to be one. ?

Red rtl is adjusted based on a fact the the orange down traverse in the am is faster fractal ( as it seems to me). If you draw that rtl through the 2 bar of the yesterday , you get your BO.

My appologies: I still don't understand what you mean by adjusted Red RTL and due to FF Orange ?
I'm probably mising something ?
Wouldn't be the first time.

So on my attached chart it's the highlighted blue box.
Yes I see the BO of a black carry over RTL, on two bars.
But not the Violet (WHite added once the BO turned into FBO).
The PV on the 18:10 bar would at least gi ve me more to concider re: WMCN.
If I did read that as a valid BO and the DRV on the 18:15 bar as a valid retrace to a P3 of the beginning of a newly forming up traverse, the IRV on bar 18:20 (also at the Acc Tr RTL!) would have me thinking the dominos are not falling correctly. Not to mention the BO of the next lower (green on my chart) RTL.

There after I suppose it's one domino at a time. ?
I still have a long way to get to "knowing that I know" and I don't yet know what it is that I need to know to know that I know.

I'm still contemplating on Spyders recent post (thanks for your continued efforts to help and enlighten Spyder)

Anyway, I hope this is of use and haven't made a pigs ear of things.
 

Attachments

Quote from romanus:


Oh ok I see what you're refering to, thx

But I still don't understand what your saying other than because the day in question looked similar to a past chart that today would behave in exactly the same way ?

I can only think of my first reply, I can see how wide your forest is now but doesn't it still require a BO of the Red RTL and dominos to get us to a P2 of a first Dom traverse of a newly forming up Channel ?

I too stuggle with differenciating between expectation and fact.
As I see it, one is a projection of what one wants or may exist in the future, and the other is what's happening now in the present moment.

From my own experience so far of all this, the greater the expectation the less the decision, taken, was based on "knowing that I know".

I had to learn (still learning ) to not expect to be right or wrong but to know what, or what not, to expect on the next domino and to take the appropriate action.

Ultimatley, knowing = hit the reverse button
 
quote from ...:

You may need to hear the message a few more times before you are willing to really listen to what's being said. It's not that you are slow; it's just that you may be resistant to changing your routine, even if it's in your best interest. Of course, no one else can make this judgment for you, but at least remain open to the practical suggestions you receive now. Trust that others are just trying to help.
 
Quote from workwithus:

romanus the fact that you anticipated a change at 1130 put you way ahead of the herd.if you had acted on it you could then ride it till the rtl that you had in place.about a 10 pt run.now if your sequences are off for whatever reason you could still look for continuation or change at the rtl.in this situation change would occur and you could exit or reverse in the direction of the trend.at this point you can review your thought process on the sequences.
yeah, wel I anticipated change at 1310 as well but i thought it was gonna go from p2 to p3 up. notice the 1330 pen bo. 1335 didn't provide more increasing volume - so up trend didn't change , right? RIGHT??
 
Sorry I’m getting confused here. Are you saying that from 13.20 (eob) till 13:45 you thought it was a non dominant red V and you were anticipating new pt 3 up?
 
Quote from Jack Hershey:

You do not go through a process, subsequently, to see if you were right or wrong. We are in a different business than the right/wrong business. We are in the business of making money by being on the right side of the market as price changes.

FWIW
 
Back
Top