Quote from BA_Trader:
I guess you just look for sequences and flaws... this to me is the
difficulty with rockets and icebergs -- sequences and flaws. The
market at any moment is more like an impressionist painting
than a parts list for a military vehicle.
I'm working on trying to get directional bias and momentum
of that bias from longer time frames and then using this info to
figure out the context for NOW. My goal is to to be able to
quickly 'get a feel' for bias and then use this to filter whatever
signal I'm using.
The ultimate goal would be applying this to IF1/IF2 -- because
IMO this strategy is way better than rockets and iceberg.
IF1/IF2 really has to be filtered tho because it gets whipsawed
terribly in stalls... and it has some problems with some long bar
situations.
Good trading to ya tomorrow
JT
BA
A warning about if2 trading. I spent to much time (skipping steps) and trying to IF2 trade. IF2s particularly the ones that represent the appropriate number of stops back (for the market pace) are very important but IF2 trading is tough. the reason as I see it is that you are looking at the results without the reason. the meat is what you need to make your decisions based on, specifically volume (PRV
repeated interaction of water and earth that really matter.
I currently am finding context in the IT trend. This is very kewl, and relaxing. I found your post on the IT that you made on 3/16 very interesting. As I see it your channel was Newby's initial point3. If you connect the points you labeled B & C to represent the 'airplane leveling off' your Price/volume coments hold up very well. Is that how you were looking at it?
anyway just my 2 cents. Great disscussion. Heres to volitility.
.