It is white collar jobs' turn for layoffs and paycuts

I'm not opposed to the hiring of H1B/f1 talent even over domestic talent, but as it stands it's ripe for fraud and staffing agencies just turn a blind eye to it. I can call a uni and get a transcript, i'm not sure most staffing agencies are doing this w/foreign workers.

I'm not, either. Specifically, I think US and India should be joined at the hip. Let them produce all the engineers we need, regardless of the intellectual imbalance that causes their society. But, I need to shut up....
 
Last edited:
it's corporate, no US contracts. It should be easy to out compete a bad staffing company. I'll take green kids out of college with decent senior projects 8/10 times over an non-vetted F1/H1Bs w/3 yrs of experience. I struggle to get some of the f1s/H1Bs to apply new efficient methods and just get pushback because they've learned a certain way that gets the job 80% done and takes 10x as long.

A lot of it lies on management and HR's lap. I swear we've had at least 2 contingents that I don't even know if they studied what they said they studied. As in they don't even know how to use excel level bad.
Why don't you start your own company to compete with your current company? Non-competes aren't enforceable in CA.
 
Anything and everything that can be replaced by AGI and AI will be done. The creative class will emerge due to a new resource progressive adaptability. All redundancies will be eliminated and complete streamlining of Corporatocracy will occur. I.e. WebMD, Legalzoom and online schooling (Lawyers, Doctors and Educators)

Profits only no people,

Akuma
 
Why don't you start your own company to compete with your current company? Non-competes aren't enforceable in CA.
I considered it as a profitable side business, but staffing & training isn't my passion ....I'd have to found it and let someone take the reigns after a while. I've got too many projects as is unfortunately. Yes, I know I'm venting and not offering to fix the problem.

I'm not, either. Specifically, I think US and India should be joined at the hip. Let them produce all the engineers we need, regardless of the intellectual imbalance that causes their society. But, I need to shut up....

Brain drain from developing countries does pose an ethical quandry not just in the immediate future but even from a biological/evolutionary stand point. Are we creating an unintentional eugenics program through merit immigration? On the other side of the ethics question, how can we fault someone from seeking a better life even if it means leaving for another land? Would we fault soviet defectors after all?
 
Last edited:
If this was truly the case, then anyone can certainly renounce and become an illegal immigrant here in the U.S. themselves. Of course not a single American would even consider renouncing while planning to stay in the US in order to receive this mythical "better than citizen" treatment, it would be absurd. Thus highlighting the absurdity of that statement.

I said "many cases" not all cases. There are also benefits to being a citizen that undocumented residents do not enjoy. One case where undocumented residents are treated better than citizens, at least in 19 states is in qualifying for the discounted in-state tuition:

https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-overview.aspx

The downside and why everyone does not do that, from the link above:

"Even if undocumented students attend college, they will not be employable if they are still undocumented after graduation. A 2005 Wall Street Journal article depicts the grim situation facing Texas students who attend college under the undocumented student tuition law, and find themselves with a degree, but no job."
 
I heard from a guy who joined FB recently, his team have to leave the video connection on all day during covid wfh. So everyone in the team can see each other just like they were in the office. Thats a bit too much big brother for my liking..

Sounds horrible. At least in the office, if it's large enough, you can go somewhere else if you don't want to be bothered.
 
I said "many cases" not all cases. There are also benefits to being a citizen that undocumented residents do not enjoy. One case where undocumented residents are treated better than citizens, at least in 19 states is in qualifying for the discounted in-state tuition:

https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-overview.aspx

The downside and why everyone does not do that, from the link above:

"Even if undocumented students attend college, they will not be employable if they are still undocumented after graduation. A 2005 Wall Street Journal article depicts the grim situation facing Texas students who attend college under the undocumented student tuition law, and find themselves with a degree, but no job."
That changed with DACA
 
I said "many cases" not all cases. There are also benefits to being a citizen that undocumented residents do not enjoy. One case where undocumented residents are treated better than citizens, at least in 19 states is in qualifying for the discounted in-state tuition:

https://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-overview.aspx

The downside and why everyone does not do that, from the link above:

"Even if undocumented students attend college, they will not be employable if they are still undocumented after graduation. A 2005 Wall Street Journal article depicts the grim situation facing Texas students who attend college under the undocumented student tuition law, and find themselves with a degree, but no job."
In order to qualify for in-state tuition they had to have met the same basic standard as a citizen would have to qualify for in-state tuition, generally having gone to high school for at least 3 years in the state. So no, they're not being treated "better" than U.S. citizens, just the same (I realize there a technical differences in the qualification we could quibble about that made it not exactly the same, but it's close enough that we can all reasonably agree there's no real difference in practice).

And I have to point out, that's just one case, not many:sneaky:
 
In order to qualify for in-state tuition they had to have met the same basic standard as a citizen would have to qualify for in-state tuition, generally having gone to high school for at least 3 years in the state. So no, they're not being treated "better" than U.S. citizens, just the same (I realize there a technical differences in the qualification we could quibble about that made it not exactly the same, but it's close enough that we can all reasonably agree there's no real difference in practice).

And I have to point out, that's just one case, not many:sneaky:

Not to mention it's not even an advantage. All citizens are welcome to move to the state of their choice, go to high school there and pay property taxes through rent or ownerships which would give them the right to get in-state tuition. The same way undocumented students do.
 
Back
Top