It is official, Bush most hated president ever...

awwwwwwwww... ZZZZenu's campaign is in twuble. Hillawy top adviser Mickey Kantor calls Indianans "White N***ers" and "sh**"! wonder how that's gonna play out. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


darn it.. and right before indiana's primary tuesday. sniffle sniffle.......... LOL


awwwww.. ZZZzenu go boo hoo.
 
Bush on TV right now saying that the high cost of energy is due to the fact that the U.S. is prevented from drilling for oil in Alaska!!

Not a paraphrase, he just said exactly that. This is where he gets a bad rap. Where are his advisors??
 
Quote from traderNik:

Bush on TV right now saying that the high cost of energy is due to the fact that the U.S. is prevented from drilling for oil in Alaska!!

Not a paraphrase, he just said exactly that. This is where he gets a bad rap. Where are his advisors??

Dubai
 
Quote from ratboy88:

sad isn't it. just look at the fools on this thread.... they are responsible for allowing the continuation of these crimes. if they weren't so fkn stupid we could elect decent people who would stop the criminals and get our country back.


these idiots don't even realize the bushes and clintons are part of the same crime family.


Its totally messed. Its like we're living in 1938 Germany.

People won't even listen to stuff thats openly admitted. The Government signs the NAU, then says its a "conspiracy theory".

What I've realized is people are so dumbed-down, they need to be told what to think. The Government and media are there to form our opinions for us - interpreting our news by subtle (or not so subtle) cues and inflections they give while reporting it.

OH SO WHAT about Bohemian Grove.

WHO CARES about that new world order NONSENSE.

But then go in real low and ominous tones with the next faked Osama tape.

Goldstein is real, ladies and gentlemen. He wants to kill us all........He really does....
 
Quote from hapaboy:

My goodness. Yet another enlightened ETer who has caught on to most of the Zzzztroll's modus operandi.

Nik, RM, you catching this? :)

As an outside observer I would say this "Gord' fellow is almost completely clueless!

How can any SANE person defend what Bush has done to the USA over the past two terms?
 
Quote from Alex_in_Oz:

As an outside observer I would say this "Gord' fellow is almost completely clueless!

How can any SANE person defend what Bush has done to the USA over the past two terms?
Why don't you just talk to me - oh so informed one?

I was comparing Clinton to Bush and showing how Clinton had been given a complete pass by the media for one of the worst presidencies in modern history. In fact they defended him. So let's take a look at what they defended:

Bill Clinton started his presidency with an expanding economy and left it in a disaster. First there was the stock market bust. And don't forget about the Enron, Tyco, Worldcom, Global Crossing, etc. fiascoes. Those led to a recession (remember it was president Clinton that declared that the business cycle was over - LOL). Then there was the "Wall" which he erected between the FBI, the NSA and the CIA so they could not share information and dig into his Chinese money-laundering, and which led to the security intel failure of 9/11. Oh, and don't forget about allowing Loral Space to hand the Chinese ballistic missile technology that brought them 30 years ahead, and now they have nukes that can reach N.A. (was that a payoff for the laundered money they contributed to his campaigns or was it from being blackmailed over Monica or other "interns"?). And then after much posturing in 1998 about Saddam's WMD's president Clinton instead left his mess for president Bush to solve:

Transcript President Clinton explains Iraq strike - December 16, 1998

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world."

"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government - a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people."

"If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people."

"And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

President Clinton should have invaded Iraq in 1998 when Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out, and they knew he still had stockpiles of WMD's. But we all know that Clinton was just a poser - everything he said and did was with an eye on the polls (and the Monika problem).

Sudan offered to hand over Osama bin Laden to President Clinton on a platter, but Clinton refused to take him. Look where that led to.

President Clinton also let North Korea continue to develop its nuclear weapons program without repercussions even though he supposedly "negotiated" an agreement with the N. Koreans to not make nukes.

The political correctness of the Clinton administration had CIA operatives sewing "diversity quilts" supposedly to make them more sensitive to the countries they were supposed to spy on. That and similar nonsense allowed Libya to develop a nuclear weapons program even more sophisticated and mature than today's Iran program. (Thank goodness Bush invaded Iraq, which directly led to Libya voluntarily giving up its nuke program so it would not be the next country invaded by Bush - that alone makes the Iraq war worthwhile.)

And then there was the illegal attack on Serbia without UN consultation or approval and based on a completely fraudulent "500,000" Kosovars supposedly "ethnically cleansed" and Clinton comparing it to the Holocaust on television to sell the war. This was done to make up for the "embarrassment" of allowing up to 1 million Tutsis be mass murdered in Rwanda, after which Clinton admitted as few as 5,000 troops could have prevented the slaughter. It turned out a few thousand Serbs and Kosovars had died - hardly "ethnic cleansing".

And there was the selling of White House bedrooms.

And severely cutting CIA funds and resources when terrorism was on the rise.

Of course there was FBI filegate.

And there was the botched peace agreement that led to the Palestinian Intifada.

And of course we can't forget White Water, impeachment, cattle futures and bombing aspirin factories.

President Clinton will always be known as the "blue dress" joke-of-a-president who couldn't keep his pants up, or his enemies down.

But in the media's eyes he could do no wrong...
 
What's the obsession with W? The guy IS a dolt! But he isn't running!

Zzzzz, you like to talk about how dumb Republicans are, but my God, your little liberal Democrats are giving them a run for the money. You guys are going to give the election to McCain on a silver platter.

And your backup plan is to hope algore runs. The same algore that couldn't win after Clinton. You know, the guy that couldn't carry HIS OWN STATE! The guy that ASKED THE FUCKING COURTS TO GET INVOLVED IN THE ELECTION, after he conceded!

Yea, you guys are real fucking bright! Remember one thing.......Bush beat you twice. How does that feel, Zzzzz? How does it feel to get your ass kicked by a dolt........TWO TIMES?


Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha:D :D
 
Another proud republican post by Arnie, proud to have a dolt in office for 2 terms, proud to have helped put a dolt there for 8 years....

If you really gave a damn about America above just keeping power, you would be disturbed about having elected Bush.

And now you are happy to support another dolt John McCain, just because he can keep the republicans in power?

If only the dems would wake up and understand how self centered and power hungry these republiklans really are, they might perhaps win the election. The republicans don't really care about what is best for America, a dolt if fine with them as long as they are in power.

Pathetic...and essentially unAmerican.

Quote from Arnie:

What's the obsession with W? The guy IS a dolt! But he isn't running!

Zzzzz, you like to talk about how dumb Republicans are, but my God, your little liberal Democrats are giving them a run for the money. You guys are going to give the election to McCain on a silver platter.

And your backup plan is to hope algore runs. The same algore that couldn't win after Clinton. You know, the guy that couldn't carry HIS OWN STATE! The guy that ASKED THE FUCKING COURTS TO GET INVOLVED IN THE ELECTION, after he conceded!

Yea, you guys are real fucking bright! Remember one thing.......Bush beat you twice. How does that feel, Zzzzz? How does it feel to get your ass kicked by a dolt........TWO TIMES?


Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha:D :D
 
This news? I think I've been saying this for about 3 years.





Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/01/bush.poll/index.html

Poll: More disapprove of Bush than any other president

* Story Highlights
* President Bush's disapproval rating hits all-time high in polling
* More than 70 percent disapprove in CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll
* Survey indicates support for Iraq war has never been lower
* Low approval numbers come five years after "Mission Accomplished" moment

By Paul Steinhauser
CNN Deputy Political Director

WASHINGTON DC (CNN) -- A new poll suggests that President Bush is the most unpopular president in modern American history.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Thursday indicates that 71 percent of the American public disapprove of how Bush is handling his job as president.

"No president has ever had a higher disapproval rating in any CNN or Gallup Poll; in fact, this is the first time that any president's disapproval rating has cracked the 70 percent mark," said Keating Holland, CNN's polling director.

"Bush's approval rating, which stands at 28 percent in our new poll, remains better than the all-time lows set by Harry Truman and Richard Nixon [22 percent and 24 percent, respectively], but even those two presidents never got a disapproval rating in the 70s," Holland said. "The previous all-time record in CNN or Gallup polling was set by Truman, 67 percent disapproval in January 1952."

While Gallup polling goes back to the 1930s, it wasn't until the Truman years that they began surveying monthly approval ratings.

CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider adds, "He is more unpopular than Richard Nixon was just before he resigned from the presidency in August 1974."

President Nixon's disapproval rating in August 1974 stood at 66 percent

The poll also indicates that support for the war in Iraq has never been lower. Thirty percent of those questioned favored the war, while 68 percent opposed it.

"Americans are growing more pessimistic about the war," Holland said. "In January, nearly half believed that things were going well for the U.S. in Iraq; now that figure has dropped to 39 percent."

The numbers on the Iraq war come on the five-year anniversary of Bush's "Mission Accomplished" moment on board the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, when he proclaimed that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

The record-low support for the war in a CNN poll could be one reason behind the president's unpopularity, but it probably is not the only one.

"Support for the war, the assessment of the economy and approval of Mr. Bush are all about the same -- bad," Schneider said.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll was conducted by telephone from Monday through Wednesday among 1,008 adult Americans.

The poll's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
 
Back
Top