I like Ripley's numbers. So it's not even a zero-sum game, but negative. If you consider the market overall to be a big poker-table, the money's being shifted around, but is also being siphoned off. To keep the same amount of money on the table, you have to keep on feeding it cash.
Sure, there are a small minority of winners, and they don't win all the time. As in poker, it requires many people losing each hand to compound the larger amount taken in by the one winner.
Sure, there are a small minority of winners, and they don't win all the time. As in poker, it requires many people losing each hand to compound the larger amount taken in by the one winner.