It Begins. Holder Announces Plan To Ban Semi-Auto Guns

[OPTIONAL777]

So those who actually cannot afford guns and ammo should be fully armed by the government and taxpayer money (each citizen is issued the same semi automatic weapon and enough ammo to get the job done) just to keep the playing field even?

LOL!

Quote from Tigerjaw:

What an elitist response - - so typical of rich libs. Just do a search on Congressional anti-gunners - - - with carry permits because they "need the protection". Laws and rights are for the peons, not for them.

What are you going to say next - "Let them eat cake." ?

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Ahhh, a little stalker boy on a mission.

Thanks for the bump...

Quote from MoreCowbell:

Taking a break from the kiddie porn, I see.

 

[ByLoSellHi]

Congratulations, ET!!!

We've got members who'd belong right on Strormfront.com right here among us!


We've reached a new low!!!



Yeah!

And I'm a solid to the core believer in the right to keep and bear arms for Americans who don't have a felony criminal record (I'd even go so far as to specify a felony having to do with violence, particularly, such as felony assault, armed robbery, etc.)

(p.s. - this is the kind of stuff that discredits this site more than any, single other thing - it makes stock_trd3r seem reasonable by comparison)

Quote from Mag Light:

q: you are white, a black buck breaks into your home, kills your son, rapes your daughter, and makes your wife watch both actions. you happen to walk into the house just as the black buck points his gun at your wife. you immediately grab your gun and make a good nigger out of the black buck. can you guess the first thing the police will ask you when they arrive?

a: is that gun registered? we are going to have to charge you with a hate crime; put your hands behind your back.



.45 is for protection; 911 is nothing more than a means to alert someone to come out and draw a chalk line around the body.

you liberals are brain dead pussies. end of story.

 

[ByLoSellHi]

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Guns don't kill. Brown people kill.

I could arm every household in Walnut Creek and there wouldn't be a homicide. If I dropped a single gun into Richmond or Oakland it would find a way to shoot someone in a robbery.......

And you're still the moron who was always destined to run on the David Duke political ticket, Pabsty.

And you'll always be that moron, apparently.

 

[Pa(b)st Prime]

Great comeback. Since you do nothing all day except cut and paste why don't you REFUTE my claim. Start in your hometown of Detroit.........

Quote from ByLoSellHi:

And you're still the moron who was always destined to run on the David Duke political ticket, Pabsty.

And you'll always be that moron, apparently.

 

[CaptainObvious]

I don't own a gun, nor do I want to own one. However, only a complete moron would think that gun control will deter violent crime. Here's a novel idea for you radical lefties. How's about we enforce the fucking laws we have on the books? Problem solved!

 

[dcvtss]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

So those who actually cannot afford guns and ammo should be fully armed by the government and taxpayer money (each citizen is issued the same semi automatic weapon and enough ammo to get the job done) just to keep the playing field even?

LOL!

Works for Switzerland

 

[Tigerjaw]

Quote from CaptainObvious:

I don't own a gun, nor do I want to own one. However, only a complete moron would think that gun control will deter violent crime. Here's a novel idea for you radical lefties. How's about we enforce the fucking laws we have on the books? Problem solved!

A very reasonable statement and one born out by the facts.

Personally I don't care what someone chooses to do. They want a gun ? Fine. They choose not to own one, or allow one in their own homes ? Fine, too. That's a free choice, we're Americans & can decide for ourselves.

The problem exists when others decide that I should make their same choice. The 'justification' is that its for some higher purpose which they determine - - even though simple logic would lead one to conclude that only the law abiding citizen, not criminals, abide by such laws.

Well, I've wasted enough time and will take the advice of another poster to quit feeding this useless thread. Its obvious that there are those with entirely opposite world views. I have a pretty good idea what side the Founding Fathers would take on this . . . but then again that was 200 years ago and representative democracy by an informed citizenry made up of free men is so obsolete. - -

 

[murray t turtle]

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

How many guns are within a 10 foot radious of Obama protecting him each day?

If Obama feels that HIS LIFE is worth protecting via the presense of firearms then why isn't mine?


Chicago has had HANDGUN prohibition since I think 1989. Twenty friggin' years and STILL Chicago routinely leads the U.S. in shooting deaths. The ineffectualness of gun laws should be obvious to anyone with a brain greater than the size of a pea.

If 10 years for armed robbery or if capital punishment for murder isn't enough of a deterrent to the criminally inclined why would a bad guy quake in his boots over a short sentence for possession of a firearm?

=============================

Exactly PaPrime


Good Chicago trend. Since President Barack knows his life is protected partialy with firearms , why not mine???

 

[murray t turtle]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

The doctors of the time of the framing of the Constitution knew what they were doing.

Because they knew what they were doing based on the level of scientific understanding, etc. in that day...that means today's doctors should be applying the same methods and technology, foregoing the advancements we have seen?

Did the framers know that blacks......;
women.......?????

The problem with the regressives is that they selectively apply inconsistent logic to a 200+ year old situation.


A good parent wants his children to grow up and learn to think for themselves, which is what the Framers wanted.

We don't live in the past, we live in the present moving toward the future...which is not 1776.

========================

O777
Tough , thoughtful questions.

a] Thats exactly why i have voted for ''doctors'' [lawyers, senators...] on the NRA board of directors.......................

b]Dont know anyone that thinks our brillant framers were infallible.
But I do know plenty of gunowners that helped Justice Clarence Thomas [black or brown] get in Supreme court. He is right on the second ammendment also.

c] Attractive woman [picture !] with the gun & black walnut colored hair.
I do know plenty of gunowners that voted for female Rep 7th district of TN/Marsha Blackburn.She is right on second ammendment also. So there.

Big problem with some who dislike the second ammendment;
they dont know much history.

Dont know if he was a Democrat[perhaps] or a Republican. But Benard Baruch [quail shooter]said vote for the person who promises the least-you will be least disappointed. That's wisdom

Gun control laws simply promises too much;
thats why it always disapopoints.