It Begins. Holder Announces Plan To Ban Semi-Auto Guns

Quote from Tigerjaw:

...They don't think - - - they emotionally react.
Quote from Lucrum:

BINGO!
Quote from fhl:

This young lady seems to be aware of her constitutional rights, and would doubtfully be persuaded to give them up by the type of hackneyed reasons being offered here.

122hymt.jpg
Quote from Tigerjaw:

...They don't think - - - they emotionally react.
Quote from Lucrum:

BINGO!
 
The country that's filled with blacks and browns......

American whites have a lower homicide rate than much of Europe.....
Quote from Thunderdog:

Answer these 2 simple questions.

1. Which First World country has the most lax gun laws?

2. Which First World country has the highest gun crime rate?





Answer: The United States of America
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Answer these 2 simple questions.

1. Which First World country has the most lax gun laws?

2. Which First World country has the highest gun crime rate?





Answer: The United States of America

Sounds like you better stay up there in Canada Dawg.
You might get your mama's boy, bleeding heart, liberal ass shot down here.

:D
 
"What do Virginia Tech's 32 murders, Columbine High School's 13 murders, Jonesboro Westside Middle School's five murders, Germany's Gutenberg High School's 16 murders, the murder of 14 legislators in Zug, Switzerland, and the murder of eight city council members in a Paris suburb all have in common? Answer: All the murders were committed in "gun-free zones." So a reasonable question is: Does legislation creating gun-free zones prevent murder and mayhem?

In 1970, Israel adopted a policy to arm teachers and parents serving as school aids with semi-automatic weapons. Attacks by gunmen at Israeli schools have ceased."---walter williams
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

The country that's filled with blacks and browns......

American whites have a lower homicide rate than much of Europe.....
I don't know the stratified statistics, but even if what you say is true, lax gun laws do not seem to be the answer in the aggregate. If anything, it may point to other issues for which gun crimes are only a symptom. Whatever the case may be, there is nothing to suggest that lax gun laws alleviate whatever underlying problems that need to be addressed. Perhaps Obama may be on to something, eh?
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

I don't know the stratified statistics, but even if what you say is true, lax gun laws do not seem to be the answer in the aggregate. If anything, it may point to other issues for which gun crimes are only a symptom. Whatever the case may be, there is nothing to suggest that lax gun laws alleviate whatever underlying problems that need to be addressed. Perhaps Obama may be on to something, eh?

Blacks commit gun crimes out of proportion to their numbers. The vast majority (95%) of these crimes are committed against other black people. Most of these violent crimes are associated with the illegal drug trade and much of it is criminal against criminal fighting turf wars.
Unfortunately, the idiotic lib "Great Society" programs have taken a terrible toll on the black community. The number of girls having babies out of wedlock and Moms having to care for kids without fathers is horrendous. There is generations of people on welfare. Also terrible is the number of kids dropping out of school, and the poor quality of those monopoly public schools. (As an example - half the American population of Detroit is illiterate.) - - - But the libs got to 'feel good' and the politicians had a ready source of votes, so what did it matter what might have been the impact on the actual people?

Plenty of black people are against further gun restrictions. (Washington D.C. is a recent manifestation of this - look it up. D.C. had extremely restrictive gun laws and among the highest crime rates in the country. Of course, the mentally challenged here will say 'it must not have been restrictive enough - - - if it doesnt work - - - do More of It ! ) People know that its the law abiding citizens that become the victims. The criminals don't follow the law.

Of course, crime prevention isn't the point . . . disarming the citizenry is the point.
 
Quote from Tigerjaw:

...Of course, crime prevention isn't the point . . . disarming the citizenry is the point.
And so begins another self-serving conspiracy theory. Does any other First World country entertain such stupid conspiracy theories? What do America's gun-toting bible-thumpers know that the rest of the modern world doesn't?
 
Other than a long winded poison the well rant...you have anything reasonable to say that would add to the discussion?

I see that you just incarnated with this one post as MoreCowshit...

Very funny. You must be another of those who are taking poison and waiting for someone else to die...

Or you are on a mission from God to protect the helpless ET members...

:D :D :D


Quote from MoreCowbell:

SCI, it's clear that you are unfamiliar with the entity that is OPTIONAL777. Perhaps you knew him as ZZZzzzzzzz, before that username was banned a couple of weeks ago for his incessant defense of pedophilia and creepy references to the rape of a particular member's children. Oddly enough, that member was banned from Politics and Religion as well, in addition to another member who trounced Zzzzz on an almost daily basis.

My point is that you should not expect Asshole777 to respond to your questions that utterly refute his reasoning (if you can even call it that). Note how he said nothing about your suggestion that he and his girlfriend would be a victim in east NYC. All he responded to was your firearms collection. So you see, he will never try to answer questions which he cannot provide a glib reply to and that will highlight the fallacies of his argument.

To the contrary, his sole purpose is to goad you into a lengthy back and forth which will dissolve into ad hominem attacks and eventually change the focus from the subject of the thread to him and you. See, he is also a narcissist; if he hasn't started the thread, or if it is a subject which offends his lunatic rationale, his objective will be to kill the thread by engaging you and any other victims unfamiliar with his tactics in personal attacks.

Note how he ended his comment to you, suggesting you are a "fear driven wacko redneck gun nut." He is undoubtedly giddy as a child, slobbering at the mouth, waiting to see if you will take the bait. If you do, this will kill the thread by becoming a tiresome back and forth personal exchange between you and him. He will continue to label you a right-wing gun nut, which you will refute. At some point you will become frustrated and note that he is not addressing the original comments you made, such as if he were in east NYC unarmed with his girlfriend. He will simply continue to not address these issues, pile on the ad hominem, and feast on your frustration as you ask, over and over, why he doesn't respond to your questions. He will also throw in how slavery used to be legal, but we have evolved from that, and the firearms issue is the same. This is all a distraction. He will NEVER directly address the possibility that he, or someone with him, will not be able to defend themselves against criminals. Nor will he answer why citizens should be deprived of the ability to defend themselves, their families, and their homes. Instead, he will throw out more ad hominem and try to steer the discussion into his tired mantra about right-wing "regressives" and how evil white men have killed millions over the centuries.

Again, the end result will be the death of the thread, as the subject becomes all about him. This forum is littered with threads that have died such a death.

What frustrates him the most is when he lays out the bait, as he has done here with his redneck gun nut comment, and you don't fall for it. Drives him batty! Treat him as you would if you stepped into some dog shit. Just scrape him off your heel and walk on.
 
Back
Top