It Begins. Holder Announces Plan To Ban Semi-Auto Guns

Quote from Tigerjaw:

You know youre wasting your breath. Hard core liberal true believers are either morons, women . . . or (if 'male') . . . pu*$ies. They believe those in big brother govt will take care of them . . . including protecting their sorry selves from physical threats.
=======================
TJ;
I have plenty of breath;
and ammo.

And besides, serious students of 2nd ammendments/history;
know the main threat, historicaly is big gov.

And JPFO [Jews for Possession Of Firearms ownership] has evidence the words ''sporting use'' is an evil idea right from the Nazi gun laws.
==========================================
==========================================
==========================================

That's a big reason.why I am against so called assault weapons micro-management ban; even though it helps sell more guns!!

:cool: And if they must set free gitmo terrorists, put them in Alcatraz Island/prison= Rep Nancy P district:D
 
Quote from saxon:

I hope he bans personal nukes, too.

Give the deer a chance, I say!
=============================

Amen, give the deer a chance;
wildlife is state/private partnership, professionaly managed, i wish you would research that , as you do for trading.

And i dont know much about nukes;
except people like Iran, & others could care less about laws


And Mr Landis,thank you, but i think you missed the point[your FBI friends will confirm this]-state laws are not even needed. Fed law [except gun shows] are highly precise ,HIGHLY EXACT.

Ever seen the multi-page fed form required to buy a firearm[required in ANY state?????????????????????????????????????????????????
:cool:
 
Quote from Landis82:


1.) There is no state restriction on the sale or possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons in the State of Nevada...


What is the difference between a "military-style semiautomatic assault weapon" and a semiautomatic hunting "weapon"?
 
Quote from TGregg:

Style over substance, hallmark of the American Liberal. Unfortunately for them, reality is substance over style.

Assuming that to be true, then what was the "hallmark" of 8 years of George Bush?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

What is the difference between a "military-style semiautomatic assault weapon" and a semiautomatic hunting "weapon"?

"A key concept in defining the military assault rifle is the ability to provide a large volume of fire through fully-automatic or burst fire modes. Every nation that uses the term assault rifle refers to a rifle with said capability. A semi-automatic rifle does not have the capability to lay down large volumes of fire required for modern military assault operations and has not been defined as an assault rifle by any nation. The term assault weapon is more encompassing and fluid than the term assault rifle and leads to confusion that these semi-automatic weapons are fully automatic or would be used by militaries in assault operations. Further, the National Firearms Act of 1934 specifically addresses fully automatic weapons, and the private ownership and usage of them is extremely regulated. To add to the confusion, the media often refers to these semi-automatic rifles as military-style assault weapons.[4] Military assault rifles are also designated under the heading of assault weapon systems by several countries but are capable of full automatic fire creating more confusion."

Technically, an MSSA is any "self-loading" (semi-automatic) firearm (unless it is a pistol) that has any of the following features:

* Folding or telescopic butt
* Bayonet lug
* Free-standing "military-style" pistol grip
* Flash suppressor
* A magazine that holds (or looks like it could hold) more than 15 rounds of .22 rimfire or 7 rounds of any other cartridge


http://www.answers.com/topic/assault-weapon
 
Quote from Landis82:

"A key concept in defining the military assault rifle is the ability to provide a large volume of fire through fully-automatic or burst fire modes. Every nation that uses the term assault rifle refers to a rifle with said capability. A semi-automatic rifle does not have the capability to lay down large volumes of fire required for modern military assault operations and has not been defined as an assault rifle by any nation. The term assault weapon is more encompassing and fluid than the term assault rifle and leads to confusion that these semi-automatic weapons are fully automatic or would be used by militaries in assault operations. Further, the National Firearms Act of 1934 specifically addresses fully automatic weapons, and the private ownership and usage of them is extremely regulated. To add to the confusion, the media often refers to these semi-automatic rifles as military-style assault weapons.[4] Military assault rifles are also designated under the heading of assault weapon systems by several countries but are capable of full automatic fire creating more confusion."

Technically, an MSSA is any "self-loading" (semi-automatic) firearm (unless it is a pistol) that has any of the following features:

* Folding or telescopic butt
* Bayonet lug
* Free-standing "military-style" pistol grip
* Flash suppressor
* A magazine that holds (or looks like it could hold) more than 15 rounds of .22 rimfire or 7 rounds of any other cartridge


http://www.answers.com/topic/assault-weapon


And how is it that semiauto weapons with any or all of the following
features

* Folding or telescopic butt
* Bayonet lug
* Free-standing "military-style" pistol grip
* Flash suppressor
* A magazine that holds (or looks like it could hold) more than 15 rounds of .22 rimfire or 7 rounds of any other cartridge

make a weapon so much more dangerous or in need of regulation?
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Booo hooo freakin hoooo...

Look, if you want guns in this country, there isn't any way to stop it, right?

At least that is the argument I hear all the time when illegal guns end up in the hands of violent criminals...the law can't stop those who want guns to get guns, simply because the NRA and the lobby refuse to crack down on illegal gun sales.

So nothing is going to change. You are going to be able to buy your guns, and ammo, and shoot people if you like.

Look, if someone comes to your house to seize your guns, just shoot them.

That really is what you want, right?

An opportunity to kill someone with your guns and they cry second amendment...


Oh, and by the way, if the gun owners were forced to pay heavy taxes on gun and ammo to help pay for the prisons to keep the criminals off the streets...

But that would mean more taxes for the gun owners...

Tax the shit out of the NRA and use the money to build more prisons, have better law enforcement, etc.

But the truly unAmerican unpatriotic clowns like the NRA members just want guns without the responsibility or the cost to have them.

Ya, ya, ya, blah, blah, blah...

<img src=http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41GHX4PKVHL._SL500_AA280_.jpg>

The republican American way, a cup of joe, a loaded gun, a six pack of Bud and non stop whining about America not being safe...victim mode to the max.


I am actually disgusted at this post. I can't believe how UN-american you are. You pathetic liberals with your hippie horseshit serisouly have your head up your ass. It's people like you that deserve to be in a situation where your life is endangered and have a wake up call. Idiots like you wouldn't survive.

It has nothing to do with owning firearms without having responsibility for them. It's about our rights as americans. Not everyone who owns a firearm is a redneck who likes to shoot rabbits in his backyard for fun while drinking beer. You are naive and moronic. Many people collect firearms like other people collect art. CAN they be used for harm? of course, but so can a pen. You want to put a ban on BIC as well? I live in new york and its annoying how many stupid liberals there are in this city. When you start to get further out of the city the less liberal it is. I collect firearms because I love them. And yes if there was a situation that required lethal force, I will be prepared. I'm not going to let some wanker try and do something to me or anyone I know if I can help it. But if you want to ban firearms so that only the people that dont care if they go to prison have them then you should move to east new york for a little while. Hang around there with your girlfriend for a little while, especially late at night. Its a great time to get to know the neighborhood. If you don't get stabbed or shot yourself then your girlfriend will probably just get raped in front of you while you're held at gunpoint by a guy who got his hands on a gun illegally because he doesn't care. But since you are a hippie you're just going to let it happen and be a victim. Good for you. Me, I'd prefer to have it the other way. If some asshole doesn't care about going to jail or causing harm to others I have no remorse for him to begin with. By me being able to LEGALLY carry a firearm and protect myself in a given situation, I know things like that won't happen.
 
If someone is collecting firearms for "art" then they can have the firing pin disabled.

Am I a hippie?

Sure, I'll take peace and love over violence and the fear driven wacko redneck gun nut...

Quote from SCI new york:

I am actually disgusted at this post. I can't believe how UN-american you are. You pathetic liberals with your hippie horseshit serisouly have your head up your ass. It's people like you that deserve to be in a situation where your life is endangered and have a wake up call. Idiots like you wouldn't survive.

It has nothing to do with owning firearms without having responsibility for them. It's about our rights as americans. Not everyone who owns a firearm is a redneck who likes to shoot rabbits in his backyard for fun while drinking beer. You are naive and moronic. Many people collect firearms like other people collect art. CAN they be used for harm? of course, but so can a pen. You want to put a ban on BIC as well? I live in new york and its annoying how many stupid liberals there are in this city. When you start to get further out of the city the less liberal it is. I collect firearms because I love them. And yes if there was a situation that required lethal force, I will be prepared. I'm not going to let some wanker try and do something to me or anyone I know if I can help it. But if you want to ban firearms so that only the people that dont care if they go to prison have them then you should move to east new york for a little while. Hang around there with your girlfriend for a little while, especially late at night. Its a great time to get to know the neighborhood. If you don't get stabbed or shot yourself then your girlfriend will probably just get raped in front of you while you're held at gunpoint by a guy who got his hands on a gun illegally because he doesn't care. But since you are a hippie you're just going to let it happen and be a victim. Good for you. Me, I'd prefer to have it the other way. If some asshole doesn't care about going to jail or causing harm to others I have no remorse for him to begin with. By me being able to LEGALLY carry a firearm and protect myself in a given situation, I know things like that won't happen.
 
Guns don't kill. Brown people kill.

I could arm every household in Walnut Creek and there wouldn't be a homicide. If I dropped a single gun into Richmond or Oakland it would find a way to shoot someone in a robbery.......



Quote from Landis82:

This may come as news to you, but plenty of "assault" weapons (including machine guns) can be purchased at gun shows in Reno, Nevada.

And for what it's worth, the NRA has made numerous contributions to Senator Harry Reid.

"Nevada does not require private gun dealers to run background checks, purchased guns do not need to be registered, there is NO waiting period, and there is no legal limit to the number and type of firearms that can be purchased."

http://theoakbook.com/MoreDetail.aspx?Aid=2206&CatId=108

Is it any wonder why Richmond, California is the highest per capita homicide rate capital of California?
 
Back
Top