Israeli Jets 'Incinerate' Fleeing Family

I will repeat this one more time to demonstrate the insanity and lack of logical thinking of stalker NikyLiky...

1. Person A is the greatest hypocrite in the world.
2. Person B has never been hypocritical in their life.
3. Person A presents an argument that is logically sound.
4. Person B presents the exact same agrument as Person A.
5. NikyLiky the stalkerboy concludes that Person A's argument is invalid because he is a hypocrite.

Bwaahaaahaaahaaahaaaaaaa.....

Oh boy, piss down the leg funny. I really think this poor little nikyboy is just too stupid to understand what a logically fallacy is, probably why he employs them so frequently....

Quote from traderNik:

Excellent point, hap. But you must remember...



http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1124110#post1124110

!!!!

Do you not love the IF in that first sentence above??

As you can see, Z-GOD is not concerned that he is a disgusting hypocrite. He admits that he is. He doesn't post here because he wants us to take seriously his assertions or declarations. He feels no responsibility to show any internal consistency in the assertions he makes. He can contradict himself at will, and if you post to show a contradiction, he responds with a picture of a negro man with his mouth open. It is left to us to figure out how this illuminates his psychopathology.
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

So much for the serious discussion.
More...
LOL, what serious discussion? You had no leg to stand on, all you did was keep repeating the same tired "they are both bad boys" slogan ignoring facts and offering absolutely no alternatives.
 
quote from Z-GOD
1. Person A is the greatest hypocrite in the world.
2. Person B has never been hypocritical in their life.
3. Person A presents an argument that is logically sound.
4. Person B presents the exact same argument as Person A.
5. NikyLiky the stalkerboy concludes that Person A's argument is invalid because he is a hypocrite.
More...

Hmmm... let's go to the record to illuminate this latest bit of obfuscation!!

The post I quoted was a result of your statement that

"I can post anything I want"

and at the same time posting

"please do not respond to my posts"

a post which you made to hapaboy.

I asked you at that time how it was that if you can post whenever you want, others cannot post whenever they want.

Your response was the weird statement about hypocrisy/non-hypocrisy that I just quoted a few posts ago.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1124110#post1124110

So it's pretty clear that in this case, your 'request' to hap had nothing to do with making a statement that was logically sound, and which would be so regardless of your orientation as a hypocrite or non-hypocrite, as you have just claimed. I was asking you a simple question about your contradictory statements on this website.

All this is negated if you can show that it's logically sound to say that you can post whenever you like, but in the same breath request that others should not post whenever they like.

You spent 8 posts saying "So sorry they're contradictory to YOU" and when that didn't work (because it is illogical, as I had posted objective proof with direct quotes from your posts and therefore your contradictions were not a matter of my opinions or feelings), you responded with this claim that your posts are not "constructed on a foundation of non-hypocrisy", which I think is one of the most honest things you have said on here, other than to admit that you are a recovering drug addict.

Ciao for now! :)
 
Dealing with you and others like you, who constantly focus on the personality of a poster are loozers, so continue to play the part....and I will continue to treat you and your brethren as the loozers they are....

<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1136149>

Quote from traderNik:

Hmmm... let's go to the record to illuminate this latest bit of obfuscation!!

The post I quoted was a result of your statement that

"I can post anything I want"

and at the same time posting

"please do not respond to my posts"

a post which you made to hapaboy.

I asked you at that time how it was that if you can post whenever you want, others cannot post whenever they want.

Your response was the weird statement about hypocrisy/non-hypocrisy that I just quoted a few posts ago.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1124110#post1124110

So it's pretty clear that in this case, your statement had nothing to do with your making a statement that was logically sound, and which would be so regardless of your orientation as a hypocrite or non-hypocrite, as you have just claimed. I was asking you a simple question about your contradictory statements

You spent 8 posts saying "So sorry they're contradictory to YOU" and when that didn't work (because it is illogical, as I had posted objective proof and therefore your contradictions were not a matter of my opinions or feelings), you responded with this claim that your posts are not "constructed on a foundation of non-hypocrisy", which I think is one of the most honest things you have said on here, other than to admit that you are a recovering drug addict.

Ciao for now! :)
More...
 

Attachments

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Dealing with you and others like you, who constantly focus on personality of a poster are loozers, so continue to play the part....and I will continue to treat them as the loozers they are....
More...


What does the above post have to do with your personality?? It has to do with contradictory statements you made here on ET, contradictions which are proved by direct quotes from your posts!!

Furthermore, it has to do with the lies you just told about 'Person A' and Person B' as a way to try to wriggle off the hook. You represented your statements as something they clearly are not.

Lastly it has to do with the fact that when you lie and contradict yourself and assert and have your statements challenged, you at first try to simply deny. Then when that doesn't work, you post bizarre images from your personal library, claiming that it's all an personal attack! In fact we have seen a microcosmic view of your entire trollish technique in the last 10 posts in this very thread!!!

:confused:
 
Are you really as dense as you are appearing to be?


Quote from traderNik:

What does the above post have to do with your personality?? It has to do with contradictory statememts you made here on ET, contradictions which are proved by direct quotes from your posts!!

:confused:
More...
 
Quote from traderNik:

He can contradict himself at will, and if you post to show a contradiction, he responds with a picture of a negro man with his mouth open. It is left to us to figure out how this illuminates his psychopathology. [/B]
More...

I was trying to figure out the relevance of that post/picture myself.:confused:
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

What is your point, I assume you don't have one....
More...
As usual, you assume wrong.

The point, of course, is that, in response to your "question" as noted below:

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Let me ask a question.

Imagine if someone constantly said that you are insane, an animal, practicing a bizarre belief system.

Would you be eager to work things out with that person?
More...
...I pointed out the following:

Quote from hapaboy:

Each side says that about the other.

What is your point, assuming you have one?
More...
Since you have responded with ad hominem instead of answering the question, as per your modus operandi, it is obvious that you have just demonstrated that you do not indeed have a point.

I rarely agree with dddooo, but he too has demonstrated that all you can say about this issue is that violence is bad, all the while failing to demonstrate any solution that exists in the real world.

Should you have any comments relevant to the reality of the situation, please share them.

And oh, one would imagine that, given your continued quotation of scripture, that you are a spiritual person. Please try to show that you are spiritual, not delusional.
 
"Please try to show that you are spiritual, not delusional."


"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser."
- Socrates


Quote from hapaboy:

As usual, you assume wrong.

The point, of course, is that, in response to your "question" as noted below:

...I pointed out the following:

Since you have responded with ad hominem instead of answering the question, as per your modus operandi, it is obvious that you have just demonstrated that you do not indeed have a point.

I rarely agree with dddooo, but he too has demonstrated that all you can say about this issue is that violence is bad, all the while failing to demonstrate any solution that exists in the real world.

Should you have any comments relevant to the reality of the situation, please share them.

And oh, one would imagine that, given your continued quotation of scripture, that you are a spiritual person. Please try to show that you are spiritual, not delusional.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top