Israeli Air Strike on Syria
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
Yep you are a clueless anti-Semite and considerable boor....but you know that all ready.Quote from I.Q.:
Yep, just go back to watching FOX News and CNN and soak up that Neo-Kahn Jewish Supremacist Zionist propoganda about how America needs to start a war with Iran for the sake of Israel. Dumbass. LOL
"You people?"...Whatever, moonbat.Quote from I.Q.:
Yeah, when all else fails, just pull out the good old "anti-semite" card, right, hapagirl? Here, I'll give you a tip. The A-S card doesn't work anymore. You people have completely run it into the ground. Try a new smear word, because that one's getting really old. LOL
If the shoe fits.....anti-Semite fits you perfectly.
You're a loser racist moonbat. Accept your lot in life. It is what it is...
Sorry Wael but no one in their right mind will take your word for anything. You've been proven to be a liar, ignoramus and conspiracy nut happy to believe any kind of absurd [anti-Israel] nonsense way too often to be taken seriously. And this statement of yours that "nothing was hit" only confirms that as always you have no idea what you're talking about :
Meanwhile, a prominent U.S. expert on the Middle East, who has interviewed Israeli participants in a mysterious raid over Syria last week, reported that the attack appears to have been linked to the arrival three days earlier of a ship carrying material from North Korea labeled as cement.
The expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid compromising his sources, said the target of the attack appears to have been a northern Syrian facility that was labeled an agricultural research center on the Euphrates River, close to the Turkish border. Israel has kept a close eye on the facility, believing that Syria was using it to extract uranium from phosphates.
The expert said it is not clear what the ship was carrying, but the emerging consensus in Israel was that it delivered nuclear equipment. The ship arrived Sept. 3 in the Syrian port of Tartus; the attack occurred Sept. 6 under such strict operational security that the pilots flying air cover for the attack aircraft did not know details of the mission. The pilots who conducted the attack were briefed only after they were in the air, he said.
Israel has imposed heavy censorship on reporters regarding the raid, so few details have leaked. The expert said that Israel appeared to have learned a lesson from its experience in destroying the Osiraq nuclear reactor in Iraq -- that bragging about an operation only makes it easier for the world to condemn it.
Adding to the mystery, Syria has made only muted protests about the raid, and North Korea, which rarely comments on international matters, swiftly condemned it.
Bruce Reidel, a former intelligence official at the Brookings Institution's Saban Center, said, "It was a substantial Israeli operation, but I can't get a good fix on whether the target was a nuclear thing." He said there was "a great deal of skepticism that there's any nuclear angle here" and instead the facility could have been related to chemical or biological weapons.
But other sources who have been monitoring the Middle East said the attack was likely to be against a transit point for Iranian weapons bound for Hezbollah in Lebanon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/14/AR2007091402207.html?sub=AR
Oh an by the way zionist boy....I will not qoute wikipidia or a Palestinian tabloid paper...I will qoute the following;
SYRIA OPENS FIRE ON ISRAELI AIR FORCE
IAF aircraft, according to Syrian officials, violated Syrian airspace in an overnight mission yesterday. "Israel in fact does not want peace. It cannot survive without aggression, treachery and military messages," Syrian Information Minister Mohsen Bilal said following the incident today.
Bilal said the government was "seriously studying the nature of the response," but refused to indicate whether the reaction would be on the military or diplomatic level.
Five IAF aircraft broke the sound barrier and dropped fuel tanks over the Syrian desert last night according to reports from Syrian officials.
"The Israeli enemy aircraft infiltrated into the Arab Syrian territory through the northern border, coming from the Mediterranean heading toward the eastern region, breaking the sound barrier," a spokesman for the Syrian military said, explaining that Syria opened fire on the IAF.
"Air defense units confronted them and forced them to leave after they dropped some ammunition in deserted areas without causing any human or material damage, we warn the Israeli enemy government against this flagrant aggressive act, and retain the right to respond in an appropriate way."
Syrian officials would not confirm if the Israeli contingent was there to attack Syria, or how exactly the Syrian Military responded to the alleged violation. However, tensions are high and the Syrian government is reserving the right to take any action they deem necessary in response.
"We warn the Israeli enemy government against this flagrant aggressive act, and retain the right to respond in an appropriate way," a Syrian spokesman said today.
Israel acknowledges flying over Lebanon routinely, but it is unclear how often its aircraft fly over Syria, if at all.
http://publiuspress.typepad.com/blackdogpress/2007/09/israel-in-fact-.html
SYRIA OPENS FIRE ON ISRAELI AIR FORCE
IAF aircraft, according to Syrian officials, violated Syrian airspace in an overnight mission yesterday. "Israel in fact does not want peace. It cannot survive without aggression, treachery and military messages," Syrian Information Minister Mohsen Bilal said following the incident today.
Bilal said the government was "seriously studying the nature of the response," but refused to indicate whether the reaction would be on the military or diplomatic level.
Five IAF aircraft broke the sound barrier and dropped fuel tanks over the Syrian desert last night according to reports from Syrian officials.
"The Israeli enemy aircraft infiltrated into the Arab Syrian territory through the northern border, coming from the Mediterranean heading toward the eastern region, breaking the sound barrier," a spokesman for the Syrian military said, explaining that Syria opened fire on the IAF.
"Air defense units confronted them and forced them to leave after they dropped some ammunition in deserted areas without causing any human or material damage, we warn the Israeli enemy government against this flagrant aggressive act, and retain the right to respond in an appropriate way."
Syrian officials would not confirm if the Israeli contingent was there to attack Syria, or how exactly the Syrian Military responded to the alleged violation. However, tensions are high and the Syrian government is reserving the right to take any action they deem necessary in response.
"We warn the Israeli enemy government against this flagrant aggressive act, and retain the right to respond in an appropriate way," a Syrian spokesman said today.
Israel acknowledges flying over Lebanon routinely, but it is unclear how often its aircraft fly over Syria, if at all.
http://publiuspress.typepad.com/blackdogpress/2007/09/israel-in-fact-.html
A UN official estimated the deaths at 500, 10 per cent of the force Hizbollah is thought to muster, not all of whom are front-line fighters.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/08/22/wmid122.xml
Hizbollah suffered heavy losses in the fighting, perhaps as many as 1,000 killed out of its strength of up to 5,000 and it is only just now recovering.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Con.../opinion/2006/11/03/do0302.xml&site=15&page=0
"Sources in Lebanon claim Hezbollah has buried more than 700 fighters so far, with many more to go."
https://www.stratfor.com/products/p...um/read_article.php?id=273806&id=273806&camp=
You "forgot" the date of this article - September 06, 2007, the next day after the attack. The article you posted pretty accurately describes what was known on that day. The information I provided became known in following days and in no way contradicts the information in your article.
Your attempt to lie again and deliberately ignore the date of your article is duly noted though.