Islamic terrorists arrested in New York

[Lucrum]

Quote from Tom B:


BTW, how did you(Landis82), a Republican of 28 years, become a flaming left-wing liberal?

Although I have him on ignore I used to wonder the same thing.

It's my understanding that while walking home from the laundry mat late one evening he was mugged and raped by a drunken gay dwarf.

Having decided he actually enjoyed it he started handing out in gay bars. But as it turns out he's not overly attractive and wasn't having much luck getting "lucky".
So he decided to have a sex change hoping males would now be chasing after him/her.

Having "switched sides" physically it only made sense to walk over to the other side of the political isle as it were.



(Unfortunately his surgeon botched his new "vagina" and it appears more like an ass hole on the wrong side. Consequently he's still having trouble getting laid hence his extreme frustration which he exhibits here daily.)


Poor bastard.

Sorry that wasn't very PC of me.

I should have said poor bitch.

 

[Tresor]

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

are you some kind of racist or something?? tell us then, what is it about??? you tell us, since you have all the answers..

I do not consider myself a racist.

My saying that US authorities presented fake reasons for invading countries is not a racist statement. I am not anti-American. It is an easily verifiable fact that the reason for invading Iraq (weapons of mass destructure) was a fake one.

My saying that Al Qaeda guys wear towels on their heads is not anti-Muslim. It is a fact that is easily verifyiable. You only need to look at a few pictures in the internet to confirm it.

Coming back to your question: of course I do not have all the answers.

What seems more probable to me with regard to reasons why the invasions started is that US plans to divide the countries of the reagion into smaller units and then put puppets on top of some of them.

Anyone claiming that the invasions are to stop terrorism should be fined for insulting his / her brain.

Not only didn't the inavasions stop the terrorism but they also increased the terrorism.

Regards

 

[Tom B]

Quote from Lucrum:

Although I have him on ignore I used to wonder the same thing.

It's my understanding that while walking home from the laundry mat late one evening he was mugged and raped by a drunken gay dwarf.

Having decided he actually enjoyed it he started handing out in gay bars. But as it turns out he's not overly attractive and wasn't having much luck getting "lucky".
So he decided to have a sex change hoping males would now be chasing after him/her.

Having "switched sides" physically it only made sense to walk over to the other side of the political isle as it were.



(Unfortunately his surgeon botched his new "vagina" and it appears more like an ass hole on the wrong side. Consequently he's still having trouble getting laid hence his extreme frustration which he exhibits here daily.)


Poor bastard.

Sorry that wasn't very PC of me.

I should have said poor bitch.

That is the most credible explanation I have heard to date.

 

[Tom B]

Quote from Tresor:

No, he meant you shouldn't have invaded Iraq.




Tom B, Please think:

Isn't it strange that whenever US invades any country it always fails to achieve the goals that US authorities presented to US public?

Did US army find weapons of mass destructure in Iraq? Of course not. Why not? Because it was a fake reason.

What did US achieve in Iraq? It destabilized the country. US succeeded in awaking terrorists that were interested in separatism.


Did US - as you were told by the media - went after Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan? Of course not. Al Qaeda and Talibans are even stronger than before.

What did US achieve in Afghanistan? Talibans once regarded as animals are perceived now as defenders of freedom in the region

What else did US achieve? US is becoming successful in a destroying of Pakistan's integrity. This country will be divided into separate countries in a few years. It pisses off people of Pakistan and of course it pisses off China.

Dividing countries of the region into smaller units seems a more rational reason for invading Iraq and Afghanistan than the desire to chase a few guys on camels.

This war on terror is not about Al Qaeda. Do you think that US army is so unprofessional that it can't catch a few guys with towels on their heads?

What size is your aluminum foil hat?

 

[a_person]

Quote from Tresor:

It is an easily verifiable fact that the reason for invading Iraq (weapons of mass destructure) was a fake one.

You're the only person in this thread who is talking about Iraq. What does Iraq have to do with the arrest of Islamic terrorists in NY and who exactly are you arguing with if no one else is discussing the war in Iraq?

 

[Tresor]

Quote from Tom B:

What size is your aluminum foil hat?

Now you tell me what size of aluminium foil hat you wear to believe that invading countries will stop terrorism rather than stir it up.

 

[Tresor]

Quote from a_person:

You're the only person in this thread who is talking about Iraq. What does Iraq have to do with the arrest of Islamic terrorists in NY and who exactly are you arguing with if no one else is discussing the war in Iraq?

2 persons mentioned Iraq before me. This knocks out your post.

 

[a_person]

Quote from Tresor:

2 persons mentioned Iraq before me. This knocks out your post.

Right... Someone mentioned it once in a context completely unrelated to this thread, no one bothered to respond and then you made five posts or so, all about Iraq while this thread had absolutely nothing to do with it. Are you familiar with the concept of a red herring?. You're arguing about the war in Iraq as if someone is actually debating your views. Why don't you go back and re-read the entire thread, you may be surprised to find out that you're talking to yourself.

 

[Tresor]

Quote from a_person:

Right... Someone mentioned it once in a context completely unrelated to this thread, no one bothered to respond and then you made five posts or so, all about Iraq while this thread had absolutely nothing to do with it. Are you familiar with the concept of a red herring?. You're arguing about the war in Iraq as if someone is actually debating your views. Why don't you go back and re-read the entire thread, you may be surprised to find out that you're talking to yourself.

Do yourself a favour and re-read the thread. I was asked for my opinion on what was my view on what the so-called war on terror is all about. My in-born politeness told me to respond to the question I was asked.

I know the concept of red herring. Do you think what you are doing by asking me questions not related to terrorism?

Regards

 

[a_person]

Quote from Tresor:[/B]

I was asked for my opinion on what was my view on what the so-called war on terror is all about.
LOL, no one asked you you about your opinion on the war on terror.

I know the concept of red herring.
Good, so does everyone else so you'd be well advised to make your attempts to sidetrack discussions less obvious and transparent.