Islamic cowards shoot 12 people in Paris - Video

[WeToddDid2]

I present you with the ultimate display of hypocrisy:

Do not insult religions other than Christians:

People of the world are better off not insult other people's religion. You will never know how upset they get.

Yes that would be wise. Insulting other people's religion once is bad enough. Doing it some more by allowing more insults in the comments section would be asking for trouble. Seems the world is getting wiser.

I don't think insulting people or their religion is justified. If there wasn't any insults, we wouldn't be here today. The problem is really quite easy to solve.

This satire clearly causes killing. Anything that causes killing can't be very good.

Well I can tell you that those who go around insulting others cannot be good, and those who going around killing cannot be good. Therefore the conclusion has to be to eliminate both.

Apparently, it is totally fine to insult Christians:

dipshit,


Please explain to me why your first response to muslims killing 12 people in France is to make a negative comment about Christians?

Freedom of expression, don't you know ? Or is that not allowed unless against non-whites ?


At least he didn't draw insulting cartoons of christians.

Now that it is bashing Christians, it is freedom of expression? Do you think all Christians are white? Why the race card?

The thread started with the belief that it was ok to draw insulting pictures about a religion because that's freedom of expression. If that is acceptable then insulting any other religion should be treated no differently.

Christianity is predominantly white. Buddhism is predominantly asian, etc, etc. No cards to be seen.

 

[ExperiencedJoe]

I present you with the ultimate display of hypocrisy:

Do not insult Muslims:
....

Except you couldn't find a single mention of muslim in what you quoted. What you present is the ultimate incapability of comprehending what you read. Did you skip "skool" as a kid ?

 

[gwb-trading]

Well I can tell you that those who go around insulting others cannot be good, and those who going around killing cannot be good. Therefore the conclusion has to be to eliminate both.

So the bottom line is that you view a newspaper exercising its right of free speech in a western country as not good. According to you this means that anyone who is offended by material in a newspaper should certainly resort to violence - because in your world violently murdering people is the equivalent of printing material in a newspaper that offends someone. Your assertion is that both are equally not good.

In this case - are you confirming all the offensive anti-Jewish and anti-Christian material in Muslim newpapers worldwide is not good? It also means that sending assassination teams to kill all the staff of papers world-wide that publish any offensive material is perfectly acceptable - because both activities are equally not good.

Glad your position is clear that murder is equal to publishing material that may offend someone. Good to make it clear where you are coming from.

 

[ExperiencedJoe]

So the bottom line is that you view a newspaper exercising its right of free speech in a western country as not good. According to you this means that anyone who is offended by material in a newspaper should certainly resort to violence - because in your world violently murdering people is the equivalent of printing material in a newspaper that offends someone. Your assertion is that both are equally not good.

In this case - are you confirming all the offensive anti-Jewish and anti-Christian material in Muslim newpapers worldwide is not good? It also means that sending assassination teams to kill all the staff of papers world-wide that publish any offensive material is perfectly acceptable - because both activities are equally not good.

Glad your position is clear that murder is equal to publishing material that may offend someone. Good to make it clear where you are coming from.

Israel do go assassinate people they don't like. Would you like to state you don't agree with that ?

If a newspaper causes people to commit murder, then it's a bad newspaper. If we get rid of bad newspaper, then there will not be the resulting murder. Is your personal preference for the newspaper to continue to cause more murders ?

My position is clearly that of getting rid of newspaper that causes murder.

 

[gwb-trading]

Israel do go assassinate people they don't like. Would you like to state you don't agree with that ?

If a newspaper causes people to commit murder, then it's a bad newspaper. If we get rid of bad newspaper, then there will not be the resulting murder. Is your personal preference for the newspaper to continue to cause more murders ?

My position is clearly that of getting rid of newspaper that causes murder.

Israel assassinated terrorists who killed people. Israel did not assassinate people who printed articles that were offensive to Jews. Can you understand the difference?

"If a newspaper causes people to commit murder, then it's a bad newspaper. If we get rid of bad newspaper, then there will not be the resulting murder. Is your personal preference for the newspaper to continue to cause more murders ?" - This quote is particularly revealing of your mind set. This means that any liberal paper that offends a conservative is a bad newspaper. Any conservative paper that offends a liberal is a bad newspaper. Any newspaper that publishes a recipe with the wrong amount of an ingredient and offends a chef is a bad paper. Every paper prints material that offends someone. In your world all newspapers are bad and need to be shut down, and printing an article that offends someone is equivalent of murder.

 

[WeToddDid2]

The thread started with the belief that it was ok to draw insulting pictures about a religion because that's freedom of expression. If that is acceptable then insulting any other religion should be treated no differently.

Christianity is predominantly white. Buddhism is predominantly asian, etc, etc. No cards to be seen.

Do you think that the people live in places like Brazil, Mexico, China, etc. are white?

http://www.pewforum.org/2011/12/19/table-christian-population-in-numbers-by-country/

 

[WeToddDid2]

Except you couldn't find a single mention of muslim in what you quoted. What you present is the ultimate incapability of comprehending what you read. Did you skip "skool" as a kid ?

I apologize. I corrected the post. Are you happy now?

However, the above post seems to contradict your quote below.

The thread was started with the idea that bashing muslims was justified, while the resulting retaliation was not.

 

[ExperiencedJoe]

Israel assassinated terrorists who killed people. Israel did not assassinate people who printed articles that were offensive to Jews. Can you understand the difference?

If just by labelling someone as a terrorist is justification enough for assassination, then has it been proven that none of the assassinated persons were not news writers who got labelled as a terrorist ?

This means that any liberal paper that offends a conservative is a bad newspaper. Any conservative paper that offends a liberal is a bad newspaper. Any newspaper that publishes a recipe with the wrong amount of an ingredient and offends a chef is a bad paper. Every paper prints material that offends someone. In your world all newspapers are bad and need to be shut down, and printing an article that offends someone is equivalent of murder.

Those are your ideas not mine. Any newspaper that causes murder is a bad paper. Most papers don't cause murder.

 

[WeToddDid2]

If just by labelling someone as a terrorist is justification enough for assassination, then has it been proven that none of the assassinated persons were not news writers who got labelled as a terrorist ?



Those are your ideas not mine. Any newspaper that causes murder is a bad paper. Most papers don't cause murder.

So now freedom of expression is bad and causes murder?

 

[ExperiencedJoe]

I apologize. I corrected the post. Are you happy now?

However, the above post seems to contradict your quote below.

So you correct a post and expect my response to your original post to take into account of the correction in advance ? I appreciate you compliments of my powers. But I am just an ordinery person with no special magical powers.