islam no go areas popping up all over Europe

IMHO The stage is set. A serious war is inevitable with in the next 5 years. There's no easy solution. The muslims won't immigrate to muslim countries because they are integrating western countries for world dominance. The liberals will give up western Europe to the muslims. We can see it unfold on a daily basis. America needs to stop "no go zones" immediately and harshly, or we'll be on the same path as Europe.
 
IMHO The stage is set. A serious war is inevitable with in the next 5 years. There's no easy solution. The muslims won't immigrate to muslim countries because they are integrating western countries for world dominance. The liberals will give up western Europe to the muslims. We can see it unfold on a daily basis. America needs to stop "no go zones" immediately and harshly, or we'll be on the same path as Europe.

Haha. A big Muslim conspiracy.

Or is it a big Trump conspiracy?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome, or consequence. In an extreme form, the idea of consequentialism is commonly encapsulated in the saying, "the end justifies the means",[1] meaning that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of achieving it is acceptable.[2]





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory


Just war theory (Latin: jus bellum iustum) is a doctrine, also referred to as a tradition, of military ethics studied by theologians, ethicists, policy makers, and military leaders. The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just. The criteria are split into two groups: "right to go to war" (jus ad bellum) and "right conduct in war" (jus in bello). The first concerns the morality of going to war, and the second the moral conduct within war.[1] Recently there have been calls for the inclusion of a third category of Just War theory—jus post bellum—dealing with the morality of post-war settlement and reconstruction.

Just War theory postulates that war, while terrible, is not always the worst option. Important responsibilities, undesirable outcomes, or preventable atrocities may justify war.[2]

Opponents of Just War theory claim that there has never been a political philosopher who argued that war poses any real benefit to any participating party. In a large number of cases, philosophers state that individuals need not be of guilty conscience if required to fight. A few nobilify the virtues of the soldier while declaring spite for war itself. A few, such as Rousseau, argue for insurrection against oppressive rule.
 


America's Empty-Church Problem

Peter Beinart, The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/breaking-faith/517785/?utm_source=twb


Breaking Faith

The culture war over religious morality has faded; in its place is something much worse.


Peter Beinart April 2017 Issue



Over the past decade, pollsters charted something remarkable: Americans—long known for their piety—were fleeing organized religion in increasing numbers. The vast majority still believed in God. But the share that rejected any religious affiliation was growing fast, rising from 6 percent in 1992 to 22 percent in 2014. Among Millennials, the figure was 35 percent.

Some observers predicted that this new secularism would ease cultural conflict, as the country settled into a near-consensus on issues such as gay marriage. After Barack Obama took office, a Center for American Progress report declared that “demographic change,” led by secular, tolerant young people, was “undermining the culture wars.” In 2015, the conservative writer David Brooks, noting Americans’ growing detachment from religious institutions, urged social conservatives to “put aside a culture war that has alienated large parts of three generations.”

... ...
 
Last edited:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe

Losing religion

A 2007 Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report argued that some Muslim population projections are overestimated, as they assume that all descendants of Muslims will become Muslims even in cases of mixed parenthood.[65] Equally, Darren E. Sherkat questioned in Foreign Affairs whether some of the Muslim growth projections are accurate as they do not take into account the increasing number of non-religious Muslims. Quantitative research is lacking, but he believes the European trend mirrors the American: data from the General Social Survey in the United States show that 32 percent of those raised Muslim no longer embrace Islam in adulthood, and 18 percent hold no religious identification.[66]
 
If I were should i have taken that as an insult? You know we aren't in Europe. A lot of deplorables don't know how to read a map.
Why, you feel insulted? One of the children that should have been left behind wouldn't know grade school history.
 
IMHO The stage is set. A serious war is inevitable with in the next 5 years. There's no easy solution. The muslims won't immigrate to muslim countries because they are integrating western countries for world dominance. The liberals will give up western Europe to the muslims. We can see it unfold on a daily basis. America needs to stop "no go zones" immediately and harshly, or we'll be on the same path as Europe.

Not necessarily IF the police and law enforcements were doing their jobs of arresting the gangmembers and criminals who exploit these people. Too many people benefit from the hardship of these people ( from cheap labor, to no-risk drug mules, etc...).
 
Back
Top