We should just nuke them ,
but won't that would be burning them alive ?
but won't that would be burning them alive ?
We should just nuke them ,
but won't that would be burning them alive ?
I agree wrt Boko Haram part. Why aren't we seeing stories about it all the time on libtard media?No, just against the "we're so wonderful and we don't engage in torture" hypocrisy. You think all those drones fire anesthetic darts?
And while we're on the subject of the outrage over Islamic terrorists, how come no mention of Boko Haram? Is no one upset over that?
I wonder why?![]()
I agree wrt Boko Haram part. Why aren't we seeing stories about it all the time on libtard media?
Pretty much. I can't provide a video of our burning any ISIS members alive, and there are no real-time films of inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasake being incinerated while alive, but there are plenty of films of the aftermath. I'm sure the films of radioactive burns would be most satisfactory to those who want to see that sort of thing. All brought to you courtesy of 'Murica.
Only a complete moron, imbecile would equate ISIS burning alive a captured prisoner to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The two are completely incomparable actions.
Oh?
Oh?
The ritualistic execution of prisoners by ISIS is much more akin the to ritualistic execution of prisoners by the Japanese using beheading during World War 2 than to the dropping of the atomic bomb.
http://ww2today.com/24th-october-1943-japanese-execute-australian-commando-leonard-siffleet
![]()