Quote from Dart:
Granted the computer wouldn't need water cooling for trading uses, but if you factor in trading into what else I'm doing, it changes the priorities a bit for what to permit in the system. If I wasn't trading, water cooling would make a lot more sense. The risk of a failure in trading makes water cooling it a bit risky. A traders perspective on water cooling it.
A "trader" would have or should have a dedicated computer for trading only and a separate computer for "everything else he is doing".
If reliability is what one is after then a basic box, SSD, video cards, monitors, operating system, sufficient RAM, broker platform, charting program, front end/API and nothing else loaded trumps a radiator et al.
Then a serious trader, may say he demands redundancy, so he has multiple computers, 2 or more ISP's using different technology i.e Fiber, ADSL, 3G/4G. Not to neglect multiple Brokers.
Granted a swing traders reliability requirement is much less, but then he doesn't need a dozen monitors either.
But almost all have performed their research, and determined hardware compatibility first. Instead of the endless, what if's. Most all hardware related questions can easily be answered via Google, and very few of those Google results direct one to ET or other trading forum.
Complex network configuration for HFT, autotrading, server co-location, hardware requirements, yes makes sense asking on a trading forum. People like WinstonTJ can provide valuable insight.
Putting together a computer to drive a few charts doesn't require a thesis.
Nothing wrong with being an enthusiast, but put it in perspective. It is either for trading or general purpose. You are either a serious or casual trader.
Hence, my +1 on WinstonTJ's post and my comment that your priorities may be misguided.