Is watching Time and Sales useful at all?

"you'll see those machines respecting support and resistance levels"

It's amazing to watch this...learn to read the machines.
 
I call using the Time & Sales along with the Depth of market "order flow".

Very useful for short term trading in the futures markets. The problem for most traders is it takes a long time to develop their ability to use the information.

Personally I do not understand how people can trade short term WITHOUT the information.
Spoofing isn't a concern to me; if you spend enough time watching a market you start to understand the games algo's play to mess with the other algo's.

As far as detecting weakness on either side it is very perceptible if you have enough experience. It is most noticeable looking at the four inside levels of market depth.

Also the footprint chart is very helpful when using order flow. Just looking at ET180's chart if you noticed the 1480 hitting the bid and no follow through wouldn't that be a clue of reversal? If you saw that plus the limit bid refreshing at that level on the DOM it is a very strong signal.

Like I mentioned, it takes a long time to learn which is why many traders dismiss its usefulness. It is much easier to pursue the holy grail indicator than to spend hundreds of hours trying to understand what seems like random flashing numbers on a DOM.
In order to read the spoofing and everything t&s has to offer you need to read the orderflow and have a fancy DOM like jigsaw, w/ jigsaw if 1 side is getting weak bc lets say the sell sides orders are being taken away well jigsaw shows you the buyers vs sellers like every dom then the next row to the left of buyers it is telling you row by row in order of the 1st sell side column of how many sell orders are being taken away and/or added at each price updated as fast as you can blink, u have it set at your preferences and it will tell you via audio "large order buy 552" or "Iceberg order 400, minus 200" etc.... and there are multiple other columns on the DOM telling you more tape reading info and more audio and 2 different types of tape measure and everything is customzinable and they have a few different toys of various ways to show you momenturm in how ever you lke to see it and order flow. The platform is expensive and only the pros know how to use it and all you get is a dom, not even the change amount of any contract and if you truly learn it you'll be amazed that you trade better, shorter times and the only thing your using is a dom. At the end of the day who cares what the price of instrument is- is there a trade there or not and Jigsaw has the answer
No I don't work for jigsaw, I own a hedge fund and just switched my entire fund or funded all traders with jigsaw, profits are up 46% higher then last year and still have 5 montyhs to go
 
I make all of my money almost using the DOM exclusively. To clarify, level 1 data only and the market orders hitting the best bid and ask (essentially time and sales). You have to observe it for a while and go in with no assumptions at all, because a lot of the action is counter intuitive with what a lot of people tout as the way to see what "smart" money is doing.

Size of orders, rate of orders, resting orders being added or removed, rate of resting orders added or removed, etc. it all adds up to algos positioning a certain way. Take notes and watch a LOT of opens and closes on a good market replay platform. There is a reliable edge there. Good luck!
what dom do you use?
 
FALSE
Prove it, anonymous one.

90% plus volume is done by algorithmic trading machines. Some are geneticly programmed thus are constantly changing.

Heck, one I am aware of is on its 10,000th itteration over the last week. It is inpossible for a human being to compete with this by staring at charts or T&S. Stop deluding yourselves.




This will be the end of the baseless unaccountable screaming ( capital letters) OR will turn into personal attacks as the technical religious fanatics pile on. Sad!

surf
Prove it, anonymous one.

90% plus volume is done by algorithmic trading machines. Some are geneticly programmed thus are constantly changing.

Heck, one I am aware of is on its 10,000th itteration over the last week. It is inpossible for a human being to compete with this by staring at charts or T&S. Stop deluding yourselves.




This will be the end of the baseless unaccountable screaming ( capital letters) OR will turn into personal attacks as the technical religious fanatics pile on. Sad!

surf

They can't prove it. They can't reply in a sentence either because just like the last comment it will not make sense b/c this person doesn't know a thing about trading. As in not only did they wash out the 1st week they tried, but can't even bs b/c doesn't know trading vocab. But spent enough time to respond in pink.
It's not for everyone
 
We all stare at charts -- that's what every person in finance does all day basically, more or less.
Charts,... along with a host of other considerations and factors and variables.

But the devil/skill is in the details or intuition -- looking at charts/trading is kind of like art...we all see and interpret it slightly differently,

The blind will look at charts like brain dead robots; while the more ...open-eyed...will see and sense things happening and unfolding constantly, :confused: o_O ...

All of this is kind of highly dependent depending on if you're a day trader, swing trader, or longer-term investor.
It's kind of hard (or not applicable) to apply a wide, blanket statement to everything in the marketplace.
Took the words right out of my mouth, you couldn't have said that better and replied any more polite. Thank you
But1Sell2- any person in this business can't be successful and think in such absolutes especially about charts in finance. I know your new but listen to this guys reply and focus on what he's saying about blanket statements. It will help you if you decide to try any form of finance 1 day. Just don't don't tell your boss about your chart philosophy, or uor font
 
Wow, so apparently there are no successful discretionary chart traders anymore. I did not know that! What a claim! Head and shoulders, double top, support and resistance...nah, that can't be caused by "absorption". Sounds like someone peddling his book!

110% that is so wrong about 90% of volume being done by algo trading machines. Besides my custom computers have algos and theyre technically trading machines.
the percentage use to be higher but the high frequency trading machines done by algos was a wall street fad, it took us a few years but all us funds figured out how to beat them and not long everyone did, that's been a dying business for a while not and on the major decline.
I also know you dont know what your talking about b/c I have a letter from the sec congratulating my hedge fund for being in top 1% of volume done that year for an exchange (I am being vague as I can't talk about my holdings) and yes we did a lot of volume but it goes to show how much volume is done is we were top 1%.
Back to good conversation on order flow
 
The longer term market participants don't establish positions based on order flow. Look at CL and ES and you'll see those machines respecting support and resistance levels, chart patterns, and trend lines all day long. To say that these patterns no longer matter requires you to make the claim that there are no profitable traders who trade based on these patterns. That's a pretty bold claim to make. I'd post a link to a trading journal on another forum, but I probably can't since that place competes with here. There is a trading journal by an individual "Gary" who trades CL intraday profitably for a living. It's about 487 pages long spanning several years and he only uses S/R, trendlines, and price action (basic trend - higher highs, lower lows). He's not the only guy who trades price action profitably for a living.
Your wrong, order flow can have a major impact. Unless my hedge fund has just been lucky on our holding since I started it in '05. It is by no means the same, but you can't talk trading and investing tactics and strategies in absolutes and succeed. But your correct on the 2nd part
 
They can't prove it. They can't reply in a sentence either because just like the last comment it will not make sense b/c this person doesn't know a thing about trading. As in not only did they wash out the 1st week they tried, but can't even bs b/c doesn't know trading vocab. But spent enough time to respond in pink.
It's not for everyone
Just bc it has a lot iteration doesn't mean the computer has found the right trade yet, 90%+ of all h-freq trading firms trades are losers, very common knowledge. The fast computer doesn't mean it spitting all that out doesn't mean its right, I can look at a chart and make a trade or know there isn't a trade in 2=30 seconds and I'm usually right. Your talking about the past, that stuff doesn't effect the markets anymore b/c everyones computers can now catch those hi feq. trades they could sneak through 6 years ago.
 
Back
Top