now we have cheap oil. is your statement still true?It is difficult to accelerate growth without cheap, abundant energy.
now we have cheap oil. is your statement still true?It is difficult to accelerate growth without cheap, abundant energy.
Well , that could make sense on Mars, if there really were "free markets" on Mars.That should have been the solution, to let the entire system do its own thing without any intervention, let the free markets work out the problem itself, even if led to the worse case possibilities. The interference in this market has made it even worse, this crisis is FARRRRRRRRRRRR from over, many will tell you were headed in the right direction but they are lying, there is no recovery on the way. This crisis is going to last beyond anyone's imagination.
I think what is missing here is a recognition of necessary versus sufficient condition. I don't think cheap energy is a sufficient condition, I am not even sure it is a necessary condition, but it could be.now we have cheap oil. is your statement still true?
Well that's the populist picture for sure. It is not clear how politicians worked there way into your four and a half year-old statement, however corporations were saved because they could come up with enough collateral to get a loan from the tax payer. In the end, it cost the taxpayer nothing, and the taxpayers' jobs were saved -- I'd hardly call that a screwing! Undoing the mess was win-win all the way around. The Treasury and the Fed together did a magnificent job of preventing a full on depression. Nevertheless we shall not forget that the Fed was the culprit that committed the crime in the first place by shirking its fiduciary duty to regulate. It was an interesting experiment, but an ill advised one, because we already new that self-regulation will not achieve the desired end. Now perhaps we can lay Ayn Rand in her grave where she belongs. R.I.P.Corporations and Politicians have been saved. Citizens screwed.