Thanks, I am.Ah, OK. Enjoy!
Thanks, I am.Ah, OK. Enjoy!
When the reporting is fairly uniform across the board among legitimate news sources, on what basis do you decide otherwise? Alex Jones? Rush Limbaugh?I also agree with everything the MSM tells me.
Zerohedge.When the reporting is fairly uniform across the board among legitimate news sources, on what basis do you decide otherwise? Alex Jones? Rush Limbaugh?

When the reporting is fairly uniform across the board among legitimate news sources, on what basis do you decide otherwise? Alex Jones? Rush Limbaugh?
Trump is a political pioneer, he has paved the way for future "long shot" candidates
that are not in the club.
He should be commended.
Zerohedge.
![]()
LolTrump is also a one-term President.
When reporting the facts, yes, the reporting tends to be uniform.The reporting is fairly uniform fairly often. That's the problem. Journalism and, in particular - investigative journalism - is a lost art.
What other side? What other aisle is there to legitimate reporting? Illegitimate reporting? Alternative facts? Find me a single source that describes the typical Trump voter as anything resembling informed. Go ahead, try it.So I try to examine opinions on both sides of the aisle with regularity. I don't always do it. I'm as flawed as the next man.
When reporting the facts, yes, the reporting tends to be uniform.
What other side? What other aisle is there to legitimate reporting? Illegitimate reporting? Alternative facts? Find me a single source that describes the typical Trump voter as anything resembling informed. Go ahead, try it.
Yeah, really. At best, Zerohedge is a radical, far-right digital rag. And that's when we're being kind. And their pro-Russian bias makes for an interesting study, doesn't it? How radical far-right goes hand in hand with a pro-Russian bias? Meditate on that one.I'd be a fool to discount ZH